2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2009.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived barriers to the sustainability and progression of nurse practitioners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…support by management and healthcare professionals. These findings are consistent with those of previous studies (Marsden et al 2003, Kenbeek & Rademakers 2006, Thrasher & PurcStephenson 2007, Keating et al 2010. Marsden et al (2003) reported, for example, that NPs need the freedom to innovate, sufficient support and appropriate training to allow true autonomy, and that practice is hindered by limited prescribing authority and restrictions on requesting tests.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…support by management and healthcare professionals. These findings are consistent with those of previous studies (Marsden et al 2003, Kenbeek & Rademakers 2006, Thrasher & PurcStephenson 2007, Keating et al 2010. Marsden et al (2003) reported, for example, that NPs need the freedom to innovate, sufficient support and appropriate training to allow true autonomy, and that practice is hindered by limited prescribing authority and restrictions on requesting tests.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Keating et al. () reported that medical and nursing staff understood ENP services however, organizational level understanding was lacking. This research has reported that nursing, medical and management staff lack understanding of ENP service capability and scope of practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small‐scale study explored perceived barriers to NP role progression and sustainability using survey methods (Keating et al., ). Perceptions were identified but the research did not allow for in‐depth exploration of this complex topic and use of a theoretical framework was not evident.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Griffin & Melby , Norris & Melby , Thrasher & Purc‐Stephenson , Delamaire & Lafortune , Keating et al . , Lindblad et al . , Pulcini et al .…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Development And Implementation Of Admentioning
confidence: 99%