PsycEXTRA Dataset 1969
DOI: 10.1037/e463442008-024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived Body Position under Lateral Body Tilt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2), an estimation method described by [9] [10]. Overall well being was estimated on a scale from 10 to 0, where '10' stands for 'I am perfectly fine' and '0' for 'I am not well at all'.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2), an estimation method described by [9] [10]. Overall well being was estimated on a scale from 10 to 0, where '10' stands for 'I am perfectly fine' and '0' for 'I am not well at all'.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important issue bearing on the formulation of a specific theoretica I model for body perception is whether adjustment of the rod parallel to the body is based upon a reference system involving the gravitational field and related to the perception of verticality or a reference system independent of the gravitational field as provisionally assumed, with Bauermeister, in this paper. For further pertinent data, see Baker, Cirillo and Wapner (1969).…”
Section: Footnotesmentioning
confidence: 99%