2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02302.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived chewing ability and need for long‐term care in the elderly: a 5‐year follow‐up study

Abstract: Increasing need for long-term care in older adults is expected with the ageing of Japan's population. The aim of the present study was to show the relationship between perceived chewing ability and long-term care needs for over 5 years in elderly persons. The chewing ability of 812 elderly persons living independently was evaluated at baseline using self-assessed masticatory ability, and it was classified into one of three categories: ability to chew all foods (good masticatory ability), ability to chew only s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the logistic regression analysis showed significant associations between chewing ability and some dental variables, number of teeth being the strongest. The strong association between chewing ability and general health is in line with results of several previous studies in elderly persons (38)(39)(40)(41). Still however, no causal relationship has been proven.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As expected, the logistic regression analysis showed significant associations between chewing ability and some dental variables, number of teeth being the strongest. The strong association between chewing ability and general health is in line with results of several previous studies in elderly persons (38)(39)(40)(41). Still however, no causal relationship has been proven.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…31 The self-reported number of remaining teeth has been associated with a reduction in chewing ability in previous studies. [3][4][5]32 The present investigation makes an important contribution by showing that this aspect represents a significant risk even after controlling for sex, age, skin color, income, marital status and selfrated memory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Several studies on masticatory ability explicitly differentiate between soft and hard foods [39][40][41][42]. In the present study, differences in MDS for soft and hard foods were relatively small and varied from approximately 0.3 up to 1.2 ( Table 3).…”
Section: Self-assessed Masticatory Functionmentioning
confidence: 45%