“…Recent reviews of extensive research on the relationship between disclosure and relational satisfaction (Cozby, 1973;Gilbert, 1976) indicate that disclosure antecedents and effects are specifiable: (1) decision to disclose covaries with perceived and expected reactions from the receiver (Shapiro et al, 1969), characteristics of the disclosure (Taylor & Altman, 1966), sex of the discloser (Jourard & Lasakow, 1958;Jourard & Landsman, 1963), the discloser-receiver relationship (Doster & Strickland, 1969;Bienvenu, 1970;Blau, 1964;Rivenbank, 1971;Peterson & Higbee, 1969), and discloser traits (Mullaney, 1963); ( 2 ) self-disclosure results in greater attraction toward the discloser, increased intimacy and mutual disclosure between interactants, and relational satisfaction when the disclosure is perceived as socially rewarding and situationally or relationally appropriate (Jourard, 1959(Jourard, , 1971Worthy et al, 1969); (3) but disclosure may be unrelated (Jourard & Landsman, 1963), curvilinearly related (Cozby, 1973), or negatively related to attraction toward the discloser and relational satisfaction depending on disclosure status and perceived appropriateness of the disclosure (Kiesleret al, 1967, Culbert, 1968Weigel et al, 1972;Wheeless, 1976). Gilbert (1976) has argued that the qualitative aspects of disclosure content ought now take research priority over disclosure versus nondisclosure correlates.…”