2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived female intelligence as economic bad in partner choice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, men put more weight on rated attractiveness. Sex differences in the mate appeal of intelligence and PA were also found in another speed-dating study (Karbowski et al, 2016): Women's higher rated intelligence was actually associated with being chosen less often, unless they were also highly attractive at the same time. Unattractive but intelligent men, on the other hand, still had a good chance of being chosen for a second date.…”
Section: The Appeal Of Abilities In An Actual Potential Partnermentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, men put more weight on rated attractiveness. Sex differences in the mate appeal of intelligence and PA were also found in another speed-dating study (Karbowski et al, 2016): Women's higher rated intelligence was actually associated with being chosen less often, unless they were also highly attractive at the same time. Unattractive but intelligent men, on the other hand, still had a good chance of being chosen for a second date.…”
Section: The Appeal Of Abilities In An Actual Potential Partnermentioning
confidence: 65%
“…However, research on actual potential partners is sparse. So far, it has mostly focused on the appeal of general intelligence and often relied on subjective ability perceptions instead of psychometrically measured abilities (Fisman et al, 2006;Karbowski et al, 2016;but cf. Prokosch et al, 2009;Driebe et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar shortcomings (faces of different individuals in each group of women) probably also bias perceptual ratings of the facial attractiveness markers regarding individual faces. Moreover, visual evaluations of facial attractiveness markers such as symmetry, averageness, femininity, or adiposity, as well as other perceived facial qualities, are usually significantly correlated with attractiveness and with each other (e.g., [ 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ]). Consequently, conclusions from ratings of potential pregnancy-related changes in attractiveness and its markers would likely be limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sex differences could be linked to the association between perceived intelligence and head circumference, and sex differences in the importance of intelligence when choosing a partner. Rather than an asset, intelligence could be a handicap for women in initial dating situations (Karbowski, Deja, & Zawisza, 2016). In contrast, intelligence could be beneficial for men, as women are attracted to men they perceive as intelligent (Karbowski et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than an asset, intelligence could be a handicap for women in initial dating situations (Karbowski, Deja, & Zawisza, 2016). In contrast, intelligence could be beneficial for men, as women are attracted to men they perceive as intelligent (Karbowski et al, 2016). It is possible (although not yet investigated) that individuals subconsciously infer intelligence of others from their head size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%