Perceived health status and perceived diabetes control: psychological indicators and accuracy

Lange, Lori J.; Piette, John D.

doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.08.004

Cited by 40 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This correlates well with previous literature showing literacy and health literacy specifically, psychological status, family and social support can influence self-efficacy beliefs, self-management behaviours, and [1,8,19,21,23,26,30,36,37,39]. These observations from cross-sectional data need to be further validated in longitudinal studies in India with interventions targeted towards improving patients' selfefficacy, as undertaken elsewhere.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

“…The calculated BMI was categorised based on the WHO expert consultation recommendations, into below normal (\18), normal (18)(19)(20)(21)(22).99), high normal (23-24.99), overweight (25-29.99) and obese (30 and above) [2].…”

Section: Body Mass Index (Bmi)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Studies from other countries have identified several provider and patient-related factors which can influence outcome measures in people with diabetes [4,12,21,23,29]. In particular, several studies have identified self-efficacy, the belief in one's capabilities in a given situation or challenge, as an important factor in successful management of many chronic diseases, including diabetes [3,14,22,38,43].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Diabetes Self-Efficacy Strongly Influences Actual Control of Diabetes in Patients Attending a Tertiary Hospital in India

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A cross-sectional survey of 507 in- and out-patients, with diagnosed Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was undertaken to study the relationships between personal, disease and treatment-related factors and diabetes control in a tertiary care hospital. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, self-efficacy (odds ratio (OR) =2.94; 95% confidence interval (CI) =1.92-4.54); P<0.001) was the single most important determinant of current diabetes control (HbA1c ≤7%), along with absence of hyperglycemic symptoms in the past year (OR=1.83; 95% CI=1.15-2.93, P<0.01), current treatment with oral medication (OR=1.77; 95% CI=1.17-2.66; P<0.007), and adherence to dietary restrictions (OR=2.7; 95% CI=1.28-5.88; P<0.009). Self-efficacy was itself influenced by educational status, employment, availability of family support, and positive mental attitudes. Our findings suggest that health care delivery inputs, patients' personal characteristics including education and attitude, and family support for care are complexly processed to determine patients' ability to manage their disease, which ultimately influences disease outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Section: Body Mass Index (Bmi)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Diabetes Self-Efficacy Strongly Influences Actual Control of Diabetes in Patients Attending a Tertiary Hospital in India

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…small vessel disease, stroke, peripheral vascular disease). These biological processes could be compounded by perceived disease burden and depressive symptoms, thus leading to earlier onset and more rapid escalation of disability (Sharkey et al, 2006; Lange and Piette, 2005). In light of these previous findings, we will also evaluate whether the relationship between duration of time with diabetes diagnosis and progression of disability varies as a function of severity of depressive symptomology.…”

Section: 0 Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Type 2 diabetes, depressive symptoms and disability over a 15-year follow-up period in older Mexican Americans living in the southwestern United States

Salinas

González

Snih

2018

Journal of Diabetes and its Complications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AIMS To evaluate how depression and diabetes severity impacts disability progression among Mexican Americans over a 15-year period. METHODS We used seven waves of the Hispanic Established Population for the Epidemiologic Study of the Elderly (H-EPESE). Primary disability outcomes included the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scales. Explanatory variables included time since diagnosis with diabetes (no type 2 diabetes, 1-10, 11-20, 21+), an indicator of disease severity, and depression. Longitudinal generalized estimating equation models were used to estimate the relationship between time since diabetes diagnosis, depressive symptoms and ADL and IADL disability progression over a 15-year time period. RESULTS Years since diabetes diagnosis was associated with more rapid ADL and IADL disability progression compared to those without type 2 diabetes. Depression accelerated the disabling process in participants who were diagnosed with diabetes 11 years or more years ago. CONCLUSIONS Longer duration of diabetes and greater symptoms of depression increases vulnerability for disability among older Mexican American adults.

show abstract

“…Self-rated diabetes control is a single-item question which has the potential to be used as an indicator of diabetes management in both research and clinical settings. Results from previous work indicate that this question is associated with diabetes outcomes, self-care, psychological status and HbA1c ( Lange & Piette 2005, Smith et al 2013, Smith et al 2012 ). However, to our knowledge no study has undertaken a clinical assessment of this question within the framework of diabetes management guidelines.…”

mentioning

confidence: 98%

Good vs. Poor Self-rated Diabetes Control: Differences in Cardiovascular Risk and Self-care Activities

Smith

Rabasa‐Lhoret

Strychar³

et al. 2014

Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess differences in cardiovascular risk and performance of self-care activities in people who rated their diabetes control as good or poor. Methods: A sub-sample of 77 participants who took part in the Evaluation of Diabetes Treatment telephone interview were invited into a clinic to complete a series of laboratory examinations. Self-rated diabetes control was validated using the following laboratory markers: HbA1c, total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio and LDL cholesterol. Differences in blood pressure and BMI were also assessed. Finally, all participants also completed the Summary of Self-Care activities questionnaire. Results: Those people who rated their diabetes control as fair or poor had a significantly higher BMI, HbA1c levels, total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio and systolic blood pressure. When asked about self-care activities in the past week, those people who reported their diabetes control was fair/poor had spent significantly fewer days following a general diet and exercising. Conclusions: People with poor self-rated diabetes control have unfavourable cardiovascular risk and decreased performance of self-care activities.

show abstract

Perceived health status and perceived diabetes control: psychological indicators and accuracy

Cited by 40 publications

References 39 publications

Diabetes Self-Efficacy Strongly Influences Actual Control of Diabetes in Patients Attending a Tertiary Hospital in India

Diabetes Self-Efficacy Strongly Influences Actual Control of Diabetes in Patients Attending a Tertiary Hospital in India

Type 2 diabetes, depressive symptoms and disability over a 15-year follow-up period in older Mexican Americans living in the southwestern United States

Good vs. Poor Self-rated Diabetes Control: Differences in Cardiovascular Risk and Self-care Activities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About