2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2021.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived load, fatigue and recovery responses during congested and non-congested micro-cycles in international football tournaments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The similar results in physical performance between matches with 48-h and 72-h intervals (i.e., matches 2, 3, and 4 vs. matches 6, 7, and 8) are in line with a previous study that investigated the differences between 48-h and 72-h intervals in treadmill-simulated conditions in semi-professional football players ( 17 ). Other studies on congested schedules have also found similar results, although the between-match interval investigated was longer (72–96 h vs. >96 h) ( 4 , 18 ). The fact that physical performance during football matches results from a combination of players' physical fitness and technical-tactical demands ( 4 ), rather than demands for maximal physical performance, may explain this finding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The similar results in physical performance between matches with 48-h and 72-h intervals (i.e., matches 2, 3, and 4 vs. matches 6, 7, and 8) are in line with a previous study that investigated the differences between 48-h and 72-h intervals in treadmill-simulated conditions in semi-professional football players ( 17 ). Other studies on congested schedules have also found similar results, although the between-match interval investigated was longer (72–96 h vs. >96 h) ( 4 , 18 ). The fact that physical performance during football matches results from a combination of players' physical fitness and technical-tactical demands ( 4 ), rather than demands for maximal physical performance, may explain this finding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The differences observed in total distance, n. of accelerations, and n. of decelerations may also have influenced the higher CK and PCR concentrations in the first phase compared to the second, although this effect has been shown to be smaller ( 19 , 20 ). Thus, the 48-h between-match interval appears to lead to a cumulative fatigue effect ( 21 ), which has been associated with a higher risk of injury in the long term ( 18 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with in-season training, the loads experienced in match-play are significantly higher ( Collins et al, 2021 ), and players can require up to 72–96 h of recovery time to achieve optimal physical performance in subsequent matches ( Ispirlidis et al, 2008 ; Silva et al, 2018 ). However, semi-professional and professional players are sometimes exposed to periods of match congestion involving up to eight matches per month, which makes recovery times insufficient ( Carling et al, 2015 ; Noor et al, 2021 ; Pillay et al, 2022 ). Adding to the effort of football match-play, players undergo in-season training cycles to prepare for competition ( Malone et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preparation of national football teams (soccer) is often constrained by short pre-tournament availability, requiring players to rapidly transition between club and national team programs before and after tournaments (19,20). This transition is of concern for performance and medical staff in club and national teams given the restricted time and insight on athlete preparation for respective competitions, as exemplified at tournaments such as World Cups (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%