Perceived Motives of Public Diplomacy Influence Foreign Public Opinion

Abstract

Although many countries engage in public diplomacy, we know relatively little about the conditions under which their efforts create foreign support for their desired policy outcomes. Drawing on the psychological theory of “insincerity aversion,” we argue that the positive effects of public diplomacy on foreign public opinion are attenuated and potentially even eliminated when foreign citizens become suspicious about possible hidden motives. To test this theory, we fielded a survey experiment involving divergent media frames of a real Russian medical donation to the U.S. early in the COVID-19 pandemic. We find that an adapted news article excerpt describing Russia’s donation as genuine can decrease American citizens’ support for sanctions on Russia. However, exposing respondents to information suggesting that Russia had political motivations for their donation is enough to cancel out the positive effect. Our findings suggest theoretical implications for the literature on foreign public opinion in international relations, particularly about the circumstances under which countries can manipulate the attitudes of other countries’ citizens. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11109-022-09849-4.

Regional Integration Efforts and Political Cooperation of East African Community: A Case of Rwanda

“…In the context of studies on diplomacy by Karačić Zanetti et al (2023), Bogatyreva (2022), and Rhee et al (2023), the gaps related to political cooperation are evident as well. These studies do not adequately consider how political stability can influence the practice of diplomacy, especially health diplomacy within the EU.…”

Standing with Ukraine? How citizens trade off self-interest and principles in supporting war-torn international partners

“…Decades of research shows that citizens tend to side with their ingroup (e.g., country, party, and occupational group) over outgroups when forming political opinions, and that they even move in the opposite direction when presented with appeals from clearly defined outgroups (Slothuus and de Vreese, 2010). Moreover, citizens are particularly inclined to punish outgroups for democratic norm violations and disruptive or violent behavior and even more so when the outgroup’s motives are clear (Kalmoe and Mason 2022; Rhee et al, 2023). Finally, research on the rally-’round-the-flag effect shows that external threats such as war or other existential threats make citizens even more inclined to support government policy and the values, principles, and institutions of their country (Bøggild and Jensen 2024; Hetherington and Nelson 2003).…”

Regional Integration Efforts and Political Cooperation of East African Community: A Case of Rwanda

“…The study suggests that the humanitarian community should continue to explore innovative diplomatic approaches to address emerging challenges in humanitarian crises and armed conflicts. Rhee et al (2023) investigated the impact of perceived motives in public diplomacy on foreign public opinion using the psychological theory of insincerity aversion. The research employed a The study used a survey experiment to present divergent media frames about a genuine Russian medical donation to the United States during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic at when American citizens perceive Russia's donation as genuine, it can reduce their support for sanctions on Russia.…”

“…In the context of studies on diplomacy by Karačić Zanetti et al (2023), Bogatyreva (2022), and Rhee et al (2023), the gaps related to political cooperation are evident as well. These studies do not adequately consider how political stability can influence the practice of diplomacy, especially health diplomacy within the EU.…”