2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2005.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived neighborhood quality in the United States: Measuring outdoor, housing and jurisdictional influences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A multitude of both external (Greenberg and Crossney 2007) and internal factors (Kamphuis et al 2010) influence how a person perceives his/her neighborhood. Exploring the relationship between neighborhood perceptions, co-ethnic concentration, and length of residence is important because the first has been linked with emotional (Weden et al 2008) and physical (Humpel et al 2004) wellbeing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multitude of both external (Greenberg and Crossney 2007) and internal factors (Kamphuis et al 2010) influence how a person perceives his/her neighborhood. Exploring the relationship between neighborhood perceptions, co-ethnic concentration, and length of residence is important because the first has been linked with emotional (Weden et al 2008) and physical (Humpel et al 2004) wellbeing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent investigations show that big cities tend to score lower than small towns on three scales: poor neighborhood quality, associated with housing conditions; home and neighborhood satisfaction with fair neighborhood characteristics; and the neighborhood quality rating of older long-term residents satisfied with their neighborhood, and young short-term residents not so satisfied with it. In all these instances, small towns scored better than large cities but a variation in the cities studied seems to suggest that those included were also those with a more generally uniform form of neighborhoods, even across varying incomes, whilst other cities where the polycentric nature of form was more evident did not feature (Greenberg and Crossney 2007).A significant obstacle to beneficial interpersonal relationships in cities is criminality, one of the greatest sources of stress in urbanites. Fear of crime limits our ability to go out (mobility) and interact with others (sociability), two key domains of quality of life.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Specifically, in analyzing the effects of neighborhood conditions on residents' satisfaction, previous studies have analyzed many variables such as: local jurisdiction effect, crime, physical decay and other activities and land uses (Greenberg, Crossney 2007); noise, green areas, naturalness and openness (Bonaiuto et al 2003;Gidlöf-Gunnarsson, Öhrström 2007;Hur et al 2010;Jong et al 2012); effects of place scale (Bonaiuto et al 2003;Lewicka 2010); perceived neighborhood social cohesion, welfare, friendliness of neighbors, ethnic, racial and economic composition (Lansing, Marans 1969;Cheung, Leung 2011); architectural-planning space, landscaping, housing services, style and condition, children's playgrounds, community halls, organization, car parks, security and disability facilities, neighborhood facilities and environment (Lansing, Marans 1969;Bonaiuto et al 2003;Salleh 2008;Youssoufi, Foltête 2013); communal services such as roads, transport services, sewer system and basic utilities within the housing area (Mohit, Azim 2012); and symbolic factors (e.g. sense of identity and prestige values) (Lansing, Marans 1969) (for further discussion, see also Zehner 1971;Türkoğlu 1997;Ukoha, Beamish 1997;Liu 1999;Westaway 2006;Stronegger et al 2010;Rioux, Werner 2011;Gupta et al 2012;oshio, urakawa 2012).…”
Section: Studies On Neighborhood Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely known that deteriorated housing, low-quality neighborhoods, urban density and high crime rates, for example, can lead to increased social and psychological problems for residents (cf. Greenberg, Crossney 2007;Austin et al 2012;Hipp et al 2012;Honold et al 2012;Kyttä et al 2013). According to Bonaiuto et al (2003: 42), this link is bi-directional, because residential and neighborhood satisfaction "encompasses cognitive, motivational and behavioural aspects, reflected in psychological correlates such as the tendency to give favourable evaluations of their dwelling place, improving it and their reluctance to leave it".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation