1961
DOI: 10.1037/h0045283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived order in different sense modalities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

40
358
9
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 610 publications
(412 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
40
358
9
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Many psychophysical observations have been made about such discrete phenomenal processes. For example, it was experimentally shown that there exists a certain minimal interstimulus interval for which two successive events are consistently perceived as simultaneous; one can think of them as occurring within a single discrete epoch [398][399][400]. This phenomenon is compatible with the idea of a discrete perceptual "frame" of ~100 ms or less within which stimuli would be grouped and subjectively interpreted as a single event.…”
Section: Phenomenal Timementioning
confidence: 81%
“…Many psychophysical observations have been made about such discrete phenomenal processes. For example, it was experimentally shown that there exists a certain minimal interstimulus interval for which two successive events are consistently perceived as simultaneous; one can think of them as occurring within a single discrete epoch [398][399][400]. This phenomenon is compatible with the idea of a discrete perceptual "frame" of ~100 ms or less within which stimuli would be grouped and subjectively interpreted as a single event.…”
Section: Phenomenal Timementioning
confidence: 81%
“…This was found even though the temporal resolution of the auditory system is higher than the temporal resolution of the visual system. The delay values of 100-200 ms are far above the threshold for auditory temporal order judgements of~20 ms (Hirsh, 1959;Hirsh and Sherrick, 1961; cited in Knoblich and Repp, 2009). We therefore suggest that this similarity reflects common, modality-independent or supramodal, mechanisms in agency for auditory and visual gait consequences.…”
Section: Temporal Auditory Motor Conflicts and Full-body Agencymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…When two visual events are perceived, so are their order but with an additional trick: temporal delays approximating the TOT between two visual events lead to perceptual motion phenomena ranging from flickering to phi motion, beta motion and alternation percepts (Wertheimer 1912). When using transient stimuli, an average TOT of approximately 30 ms is often observed within and across auditory, visual and tactile sensory modalities (Hirsh & Sherrick 1961;Hirsh & Fraisse 1964). The similarity of TOT across sensory modalities for simple stimuli is surprising given the differences of neural latencies between audition (Celesia 1976;Lakatos et al 2005) and vision (Buchner et al 1997;Schroeder 1998;Zeki 2001).…”
Section: Two-way Non-identity Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For transient stimuli, the TOT (e.g. Hirsh & Sherrick 1961) and the simultaneity thresholds (e.g. Zampini et al 2005) are very similar and approximate 20-30 ms.…”
Section: An Amodal Representational Space For Time Perception?mentioning
confidence: 99%