2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived risk, political polarization, and the willingness to follow COVID-19 mitigation guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dominating the Prime Minister’s rhetoric in 2020 [ 64 ], and underlying the Commonwealth’s attacks on the legitimacy of state public health measures, was a predisposition to emphasise the impact of restrictions on business, and to frame the pandemic response as a trade-off between public health and the economy, and the general tendency of conservative governments and people of a conservative inclination to be suspicious of any restrictions on personal freedoms [ 65 ]. The research evidence for an economy-health trade-off is weak, and still influenced by short-run effects [ 66 , 67 ] and the methodological difficulty of disentangling self-imposed restrictions and those imposed by government.…”
Section: Effective National Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dominating the Prime Minister’s rhetoric in 2020 [ 64 ], and underlying the Commonwealth’s attacks on the legitimacy of state public health measures, was a predisposition to emphasise the impact of restrictions on business, and to frame the pandemic response as a trade-off between public health and the economy, and the general tendency of conservative governments and people of a conservative inclination to be suspicious of any restrictions on personal freedoms [ 65 ]. The research evidence for an economy-health trade-off is weak, and still influenced by short-run effects [ 66 , 67 ] and the methodological difficulty of disentangling self-imposed restrictions and those imposed by government.…”
Section: Effective National Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the event of a major public health emergency, those who perceive themselves to be at high risk for infectious diseases are more likely to take proactive actions such as maintaining personal hygiene ( 14 ), wearing masks ( 15 ), and vaccinating ( 16 ); that is, the higher the PR of an individual is, the more positive their PB will be during the COVID-19 pandemic. An online U.S. survey confirmed this action, and people even put aside their political inclinations and followed official recommendations when they perceived themselves to be at a higher risk of contracting COVID-19 ( 17 ). Further research found that women ( 18 ), middle-aged individuals, and older individuals ( 19 ) showed higher levels of PR and PB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A close review of the current CMIS literature shows that political ideology has not been explored in CMIS and its empirical research, although this pandemic has been politically polarized. Recent articles suggest that people's attitudes and responses to the pandemic differ across political parties in the United States (Block et al, 2022;Milligan, 2020;Roberts, 2020). Additionally, this pandemic has been reported differently by the Republican and Democratic parties' media (Jurkowitz and Mitchell, 2020;Moon et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%