2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12525-013-0138-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived risks and risk management of social media in an organizational context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…None of the studies considered all the factors at once. These factors influenced the use of social media, risk management (Munnukka & Jarvi, ), word of mouth (WoM; Eisingerich, Chun, Liu, Jia, & Bell, ) behavioral intentions, coinnovation, perceived usefulness, information seeking and adoption, and OSN satisfaction (Abhari, Davidson, & Xiao, ; Chen & Kuo, ; Nelmapius & Boshoff, ; Tseng & Wang, ). One study investigated the effect of mode of communication (social WoM vs. face‐to‐face WoM) on social risk.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the studies considered all the factors at once. These factors influenced the use of social media, risk management (Munnukka & Jarvi, ), word of mouth (WoM; Eisingerich, Chun, Liu, Jia, & Bell, ) behavioral intentions, coinnovation, perceived usefulness, information seeking and adoption, and OSN satisfaction (Abhari, Davidson, & Xiao, ; Chen & Kuo, ; Nelmapius & Boshoff, ; Tseng & Wang, ). One study investigated the effect of mode of communication (social WoM vs. face‐to‐face WoM) on social risk.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical risk and financial risk were not included in this study as they are deemed not applicable to SNSs. Earlier studies (Mannuka & Jarvi 2014;Skarmeas & Robson 2008) found that PR affects how consumers perceive value, and thus negatively affects perceived benefits. PR also reduces the expected benefits of a particular outcome of a decision-making process and consequently reduces the behavioural intention (Skarmeas & Robson 2008:180).…”
Section: Perceived Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social risk Using social networking sites negatively affects the way others think about you Featherman and Pavlou (2003); Quintal et al (2010); Mannuka and Jarvi (2014). Signing up for using social networking sites would lead one to a social loss because friends would think less highly of you Using social networking sites may result in loss of people close to you who have a negative attitude towards them…”
Section: Item Measurement Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, hoy en día, esa oportunidad ha pasado a ser una necesidad. Las empresas turísticas son conscientes de que además de encontrarse en los medios sociales es preciso gestionarlos de forma efectiva, ya que si este "boca/oreja 2.0" no se sabe tratar adecuadamente puede llegar a convertirse en una desventaja que no solo reducirá las ventas de la empresa, sino que puede llegar a empeorar la imagen corporativa (Munnukka y Järvi, 2014). Esto es, las empresas deben implementar de forma estratégica el SCRM, de tal forma que el uso de la Web 2.0 sirva para fomentar la colaboración entre los clientes y, entre éstos y la empresa con el fin de mejorar y compartir el conocimiento (Faase et al, 2011).…”
Section: Scrm En Las Empresas Turísticasunclassified