2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2022.104047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived safety in physical human–robot interaction—A survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The age range of the experimental participants was concentrated between 20 and 30 years old, and there were no experimental participants of older ages, which also made the psychological safety field model less accurate. To eliminate such an effect, we set parameter k r in the psychological safety field model equation, i.e., Equation (13), in order to accommodate different personalities, ages, and people with different experiences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The age range of the experimental participants was concentrated between 20 and 30 years old, and there were no experimental participants of older ages, which also made the psychological safety field model less accurate. To eliminate such an effect, we set parameter k r in the psychological safety field model equation, i.e., Equation (13), in order to accommodate different personalities, ages, and people with different experiences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, many researchers improve the motion planning algorithm by studying the psychological impact of humans on robot motion in the process of HRC and propose perceived safety and human-aware motion planning algorithms to ensure physical HRC (pHRC) [2,13,14]. For example, Kulic et al [15] and Zoghbi et al [16] used PP (pick and place movement) and RR (reach and retrieve motion) tasks to simulate typical robotic tasks during HRC and captured the physiological responses of 36 participants during this process.…”
Section: Iso/ts 15066 Type Of Cobot Operation Main Means Of Risk Redu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since an actual user experience is difficult to realize in early stages of development, a live demonstration of the robot's capabilities with the user as a spectator can increase the user's involvement in the robot's introduction and influence the way users build their perception of the robot [41]. Further, previous experience with pets show to increase the minimum distance that a human perceives as comfortable for an approaching robot [42], which is a method to assess users' perceived safety in pHRIs [43]. Thus, pet ownership may increase the familiarization in interactions with non-human agents.…”
Section: User Characteristics Influencing the Acceptance Of Assistive...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People detection and tracking are key skill for mobile robots in a lot of applications including Human Robot Interaction (HRI) [1], efficient navigation among people [2] or aspects related to the safety when humans and autonomous robots share the same space [3]. In order to carry out these tasks, several approaches and sensory modalities have been used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%