2013
DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2013.860220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived severity of school bullying in elementary schools based on participants’ roles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have also considered moderator variables that could influence bystander responses to traditional versus cyberbullying and severity of the bullying incident and gender have been implicated. Young people are known to make evaluations about the likely impact of different types of bullying on victims (Chen et al 2015;Williams and Guerra 2007) and so severity is thought to influence the bystander responses they make. However, again, there is inconsistency in extant research and theory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have also considered moderator variables that could influence bystander responses to traditional versus cyberbullying and severity of the bullying incident and gender have been implicated. Young people are known to make evaluations about the likely impact of different types of bullying on victims (Chen et al 2015;Williams and Guerra 2007) and so severity is thought to influence the bystander responses they make. However, again, there is inconsistency in extant research and theory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trend is important to note, as literature suggests that teachers struggle more so in identifying more covert and relational forms of aggression/bullying (e.g., exclusion, rumor spreading) and Note. Proactive behavior expectations and approvals were treated as continuous variables given their distributions; aggression was dichotomized are less likely to perceive these covert forms warrant adult intervention as compared to more overt (e.g., physical) forms (Bauman and Del Rio 2006;Chen et al 2015;Doll et al 2004). Further, studies show that teachers have difficulty deciphering between play and real fighting (e.g., Richards 2016;Schåfer and Smith 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each item is associated with one of the four different types of bullying behaviors: physical (5 items, "Being shoved or tripped"), verbal (4 items, "Being cursed at"), relational (4 items, "Being ostracized"), and cyber (4 items, "Being teased online"). Chen et al (2013) developed the survey to assess perceived seriousness of bullying occurrences among students; therefore, the wording was changed in order to assess teachers' perceived seriousness of bullying occurrences, e.g., "Having humiliating photos posted online" became "A student having humiliating photos of them posted online". A definition of bullying was provided by the scale developers and is presented at the top of the survey.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%