2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceiving the unusual: Temporal properties of hierarchical motor representations for action perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An increased interest in learning algorithms that will equip robots to learn by imitation of actions from both humans and other robotic agents has resulted in many research directions within the area. To address issues concerning attention and perception, a hierarchical model was presented in [2]. For methodologies to teach robots to learn new skills, while Muench et al proposed to ask the demonstrators explicit questions in order to generalise an action [3], some others made use of reinforcement learning to extract useful information ( [4], [5]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increased interest in learning algorithms that will equip robots to learn by imitation of actions from both humans and other robotic agents has resulted in many research directions within the area. To address issues concerning attention and perception, a hierarchical model was presented in [2]. For methodologies to teach robots to learn new skills, while Muench et al proposed to ask the demonstrators explicit questions in order to generalise an action [3], some others made use of reinforcement learning to extract useful information ( [4], [5]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly evident in this model, which actually employs the simulated position to drive attention, whilst in previous models prediction was used to modulate bottom-up attention (see e.g. [6]). Experimental results have confirmed the advantages of the attention-based action recognition system, both in terms of precision and, maybe more importantly, in terms of decision time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these experiments, the robot associated self-generated actions with the feedback they produce once executed (including learning the feedback delays in the motor system). ( Demiris and Hayes, 2002) have described the relation of this process to a biological counterpart, the mirror system (Gallese et al, 1996), offering a number of explanations and testable predictions Hayes 2002, Demiris andSimmons, 2006), for example, a predicted dependency of the firing rate of the macaque monkey mirror neurons to the velocity profile of the demonstrated act.…”
Section: Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent evidence on how infants encode goals suggests hierarchical representations Gleissner et al 2000, Wohlschlager, 2003, and recent brain imaging data have also begun to shed light into these hierarchical representations in adults (Hamilton and Grafton, 2007). In robots, hierarchical formulations have been proposed and used Johnson, 2003, Tani andNolfi 1999), but their relation to biological data has not been explored (but see (Byrne andRusson 1998, Demiris andSimmons 2006)). …”
Section: Hierarchical Organisation Of the Inverse And Forward Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%