2006
DOI: 10.2466/pms.103.3.677-684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percent Body Fat is Related to Body-Shape Perception and Dissatisfaction in Students Attending an All Women's College

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of aerobic fitness, physical activity, percent body fat, and socioeconomic status on body-shape perceptions among 153 Euro-American students attending an all women's college. Using a set of nine female figure silhouette drawings arranged on an ordinal scale from very thin to very heavy, subjects chose the figure that approximated their Current, Ideal, Most Attractive shapes, and the shape they believed men found the most attractive (Male Attractive). Body … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thornton & Potteiger (2002), when they compared two protocols of MSE to different intensities (45% vs 85%RM), with distinct volumes, number of repetitions by sets, and equal rest times between sets (60 sec), reported a greater increment of the energy expenditure when the intensity was of 85%RM, results that coincide with those reported beforehand by Roy et al (2006). The disparity between the protocols make the studies non-comparable to eachother, the absence of the control of the variables that influence on the intensity, the difference in the volume of work assigned for each protocol of exercise and possibly the use of free weights as a training method, make it difficult to determine if it is the intensity of the exercise that determines the increments of the REE after the training session.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Thornton & Potteiger (2002), when they compared two protocols of MSE to different intensities (45% vs 85%RM), with distinct volumes, number of repetitions by sets, and equal rest times between sets (60 sec), reported a greater increment of the energy expenditure when the intensity was of 85%RM, results that coincide with those reported beforehand by Roy et al (2006). The disparity between the protocols make the studies non-comparable to eachother, the absence of the control of the variables that influence on the intensity, the difference in the volume of work assigned for each protocol of exercise and possibly the use of free weights as a training method, make it difficult to determine if it is the intensity of the exercise that determines the increments of the REE after the training session.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Researchers conducted preliminary analyses to determine potential confounding variables, including age, marital status, income, and body fat percentage. Among these variables, only body fat percentage was significantly (p < .005) related to both body image and physical activity, a finding consistent within previous studies (e.g., Huddy et al, 1997;Roy, Hunter, & Blaudeau, 2006;Ekelund et al, 2011). Therefore, partial correlations were calculated examining physical activity and body image while adjusting for body fat percentage.…”
Section: Downloaded By [University Of Sussex Library] At 08:31 03 Febmentioning
confidence: 84%