2008
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpn019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percent stocking models for four major Alberta tree species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, all cutblock transects both on and off seismic lines exceeded 90% stocking, further suggesting that trees were equitably distributed throughout the measurement area rather than clumped; this is an important measure of regeneration success in forest management (Yang et al, 2008). In terms of understory communities, overlapping groups in the NMDS visualization of shrubs and sapling species abundances showed that overall, these communities are similar both on and off seismic lines.…”
Section: Similar Tree Regeneration On and Off Seismic Lines In Cutblocksmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, all cutblock transects both on and off seismic lines exceeded 90% stocking, further suggesting that trees were equitably distributed throughout the measurement area rather than clumped; this is an important measure of regeneration success in forest management (Yang et al, 2008). In terms of understory communities, overlapping groups in the NMDS visualization of shrubs and sapling species abundances showed that overall, these communities are similar both on and off seismic lines.…”
Section: Similar Tree Regeneration On and Off Seismic Lines In Cutblocksmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These parameters were evaluated for total trees, total saplings, and total shrubs as well as for the most common individual species. In order to assess regeneration in terms of stocking, a metric used in forest management, the percent of 10 m 2 plots containing at least one tree > 1.3m was calculated for each transect (Yang et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%