2007
DOI: 10.1186/1744-9081-3-26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception of acoustically complex phonological features in vowels is reflected in the induced brain-magnetic activity

Abstract: A central issue in speech recognition is which basic units of speech are extracted by the auditory system and used for lexical access. One suggestion is that complex acoustic-phonetic information is mapped onto abstract phonological representations of speech and that a finite set of phonological features is used to guide speech perception. Previous studies analyzing the N1m component of the auditory evoked field have shown that this holds for the acoustically simple feature place of articulation. Brain magneti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(42 reference statements)
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar analysis of the PSS data revealed a significant main effect of Backness/Roundedness [ F (1, 10) = 18.60, p < 0.01], with larger auditory leads being required for rounded vowels articulated at the back of the tongue (M = 51 ms) than for unrounded vowels articulated at the front (M = 12 ms; see Figure 8B ). The large auditory leads observed for Roundedness agrees with research showing that the recognition of rounded stimuli is difficult for both automatic speech recognition systems, with the systems being blind to roundedness, and humans who recruit more subtle physical cues and possibly more complex operations along the auditory pathway in perceiving rounded vowels (e.g., Eulitz and Obleser, 2007 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…A similar analysis of the PSS data revealed a significant main effect of Backness/Roundedness [ F (1, 10) = 18.60, p < 0.01], with larger auditory leads being required for rounded vowels articulated at the back of the tongue (M = 51 ms) than for unrounded vowels articulated at the front (M = 12 ms; see Figure 8B ). The large auditory leads observed for Roundedness agrees with research showing that the recognition of rounded stimuli is difficult for both automatic speech recognition systems, with the systems being blind to roundedness, and humans who recruit more subtle physical cues and possibly more complex operations along the auditory pathway in perceiving rounded vowels (e.g., Eulitz and Obleser, 2007 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…form of auditory-motor transformation such as voice perceptions involving posterior auditory cortices (Warren et al, 2005) could also activate beta modulation, in line with available evidence for speech perception based on articulatory characteristics (Eulitz and Obleser, 2007) and audiovisual multimodal integration (Fingelkurts et al, 2007).…”
Section: Dissociation Between Beta Suppression and Reboundsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Sentence part 1 Sentence part 2 explanation is supported by the component's position in the frontocentral area, where auditory working memory is supposed to be located (e.g., Kaiser & Lutzenberger, 2004;Eulitz & Obleser, 2007). However, the connection between a pronounced effect in the frontocentral area measured by an EEG and working memory regions is very speculative, since the spatial resolution of ERPs is poor.…”
Section: Conditionmentioning
confidence: 98%