2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01778-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception of Breast Density Information Among Women in Miami, FL: a Qualitative Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[28][29][30] Thus, amending DBN content to improve readability level combined with efforts to facilitate patientprovider communication could help to improve the reach and effectiveness of DBN, particularly for women with lower literacy levels and ethnically diverse populations. [28][29][30]32 The low level of BD awareness and knowledge among women receiving DBN in our study suggests somewhat limited benefit of DBN for improving quality and informed decisionmaking about breast cancer screening. However, the public discourse around BD presents an opportune time for healthcare providers, researchers, and public health experts to broadly increase informed decision making as well as risk-and preference-based breast cancer screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…[28][29][30] Thus, amending DBN content to improve readability level combined with efforts to facilitate patientprovider communication could help to improve the reach and effectiveness of DBN, particularly for women with lower literacy levels and ethnically diverse populations. [28][29][30]32 The low level of BD awareness and knowledge among women receiving DBN in our study suggests somewhat limited benefit of DBN for improving quality and informed decisionmaking about breast cancer screening. However, the public discourse around BD presents an opportune time for healthcare providers, researchers, and public health experts to broadly increase informed decision making as well as risk-and preference-based breast cancer screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Table 1 summarises the study characteristics. There were 28 quantitative studies (20 cross-sectional studies including two with a qualitative interview component [ 17 , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] ], five cohort studies including one with a qualitative survey component [ [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] , [48] ], two randomised trials [ 49 , 50 ] and one quasi-experimental study [ 51 ], and four qualitative studies (three interviews [ [52] , [53] , [54] ] and one focus group [ 55 ]). Among quantitative studies, the sample size ranged from 77 to 631,478.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All but one study [ 46 ] were conducted in the US. Among US studies, there were eight national studies [ 17 , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , 40 , 41 ], six from New York [ [42] , [43] , [44] , 47 , 48 , 54 ], six from Michigan [ [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , 49 , 51 ], two from Massachusetts [ 52 , 53 ], two from Arizona [ 39 , 50 ] and one from California [ 45 ], Virginia [ 25 ], Washington [ 31 ], Florida [ 55 ], District of Columbia [ 38 ], Maryland [ 37 ] and Connecticut [ 36 ] respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations