2018
DOI: 10.17743/jaes.2017.0042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception of Coding Artifacts by Nonnative Speakers - A Study with Mandarin Chinese and German Speaking Listeners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For condition i02 the effect was between EN an ZH, for the rest the difference was between DE and at least one of the others 3. Conclusion here means either two degradation conditions are significantly different or not.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For condition i02 the effect was between EN an ZH, for the rest the difference was between DE and at least one of the others 3. Conclusion here means either two degradation conditions are significantly different or not.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Furthermore, [3] investigates whether foreign language influences ratings and listening times in a subjective evaluation of audio with intermediate impairments (a.k.a MUSHRA [4]). The authors conducted a study containing native German and Mandarin Chinese speaking listeners and items of these two languages.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significantly different quality ratings between these groups were found. Other studies include those looking at the influence of cultural backgrounds on timbre preferences [18], the influence of listeners' experience, age, and culture on headphone sound quality preferences [19] and various studies looking at the impact of language on quality perception of speech [20,21].…”
Section: Human Influence Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The written quiz was selected due to its short duration; despite the fact it is not an optimal means of assessing the ability to understand the spoken language. However, language understanding is not a necessary condition for speech quality assessment as demonstrated in [ 16 ]. The gender structure of the listening panels was balanced–test A included 16 male and 16 female test subjects while test B included 13 male and 12 female subjects.…”
Section: Experiments Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%