2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2012.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception of dental professionals and lay persons to altered mandibular incisors crowding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10,12,15,20,25 Our findings show that of 4 groups of evaluators, the ORT were the most perceptive when it came to crowding of the maxillary incisors as seen from the front of the patient. The LNO group was the least sensitive to crowding of the maxillary teeth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…10,12,15,20,25 Our findings show that of 4 groups of evaluators, the ORT were the most perceptive when it came to crowding of the maxillary incisors as seen from the front of the patient. The LNO group was the least sensitive to crowding of the maxillary teeth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Of course, it may also be that this group sought orthodontic treatment when they were more aware of the disadvantages of irregular teeth. 20 The results show that in all 4 groups of assessors, 1 irregular tooth was more noticeable than were 2 irregular bilateral teeth of the same type. It may be somewhat of a weakness of the LII that an irregularity of a specific value is more noticeable when it affects 1 tooth than when the same LII value is calculated from multiple teeth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations