2014
DOI: 10.1504/ijima.2014.067662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception of Indian consumers towards social media advertisements in Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube and Twitter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each social media platform has created its own identity in terms of what it can offer its users. For example, Twitter is an interactive microblogging social media platform that builds engagement via short message dissemination (Natarajan, Balakrishnan, Balasubramanian, & Manickavasagam, 2014; Walker, Baines, Dimitriu, & Macdonald, 2017). Twitter differs from other social media domains in multiple ways: namely, its ability to facilitate real‐time conversation, its precise format, its customer service, and its popularity in engagement (Ibrahim, Wang, & Bourne, 2017; Parmar, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each social media platform has created its own identity in terms of what it can offer its users. For example, Twitter is an interactive microblogging social media platform that builds engagement via short message dissemination (Natarajan, Balakrishnan, Balasubramanian, & Manickavasagam, 2014; Walker, Baines, Dimitriu, & Macdonald, 2017). Twitter differs from other social media domains in multiple ways: namely, its ability to facilitate real‐time conversation, its precise format, its customer service, and its popularity in engagement (Ibrahim, Wang, & Bourne, 2017; Parmar, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment of ads' value was addressed by nine articles (Logan, Bright & Gangadharbtla, 2012, Saxena & Khanna, 2013Dao et al, 2014;Dar et al, 2014;Deraz, Awuah & Abraha, 2015a;Deraz, Awuah & Abraha, 2015b;Haida & Rahim 2015;Martínez-Navarro & Bigné 2017;Shareef et al 2017). While the other four studies explored different constructs such as trust (Abdelkaader, 2013), beliefs (Natarajan et al, 2014;Beuckels, Cauberghe & Hudders, 2017), feelings (Morris, Choi & Ju, 2016), and advertising literacy (Lawlor, Dunne & Rowley, 2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 6 6 6 6 6 8 22…”
Section: Perception and Assessment Of Ads' Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. Pollay and Mittal's (1993) advertising beliefs and attitudes model (5 articles) (see Kamal & Chu, 2012;Natarajan et al, 2014;Mir, 2015;Natarajan et al, 2015;Dondolo, 2017). 4.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have carried out an online survey to compare consumers’ self-reported perceptions (e.g., entertainment, informativeness, etc.) toward advertisements on different social media (Facebook, Linkedin, Twitter, and YouTube; Natarajan, Balakrishnan, Balasubramanian, & Manickavasagam, 2014) or on Facebook versus Television (Logan et al, 2012). Finally, a couple of experimental lab studies have also been conducted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%