Perception of Information Sensitivity for Internet Users in Saudi Arabia

Almotairi, Khaled H.; Bataineh, Bilal

doi:10.18267/j.aip.141

Cited by 7 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To this end, we make the following contributions: We conducted a cross-sectional survey with 553 employees from Germany to gain a better understanding of perceived data sensitivity and their willingness to disclose these data in employment relationships. Our research contributes to the body of knowledge in several ways: (1) We found that perceived sensitivity in the employment domain differs significantly from the results of previous studies in other domains. Context also appears to be a significantly more decisive factor for perceived sensitivity than the cultural background.…”

Section: Introductioncontrasting

confidence: 60%

“…However, recent studies in the marketing and online context show that perceived sensitivity seems unaffected by slight context changes. In more detail, different studies have been conducted with samples from the USA and Brazil [54], from Germany [81], and from Saudi Arabia [1]. All found that the ranking of various personal data by perceived sensitivity was largely unaffected by differences in culture and context.…”

Section: Perceived Data Sensitivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We supplement previous research with a quantitative survey on perceived data sensitivity in the employment context, partially closing the contextual research gap. We also examine whether perceived sensitivity differs significantly between the employment context and the online and marketing contexts examined in [1,54,81]. This leads to the formulation of our first research question: RQ1.…”

Section: Perceived Data Sensitivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, the country of birth and disabilities may also be processed. Most of these data are perceived by users as highly sensitive in the online and marketing context [1,54,81]. In contrast, knowledge on perceived data sensitivity in the employment context is lacking.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Employees’ privacy perceptions: exploring the dimensionality and antecedents of personal data sensitivity and willingness to disclose

Tolsdorf

Reinhardt

Iacono

2022

Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The processing of employees’ personal data is dramatically increasing, yet there is a lack of tools that allow employees to manage their privacy. In order to develop these tools, one needs to understand what sensitive personal data are and what factors influence employees’ willingness to disclose. Current privacy research, however, lacks such insights, as it has focused on other contexts in recent decades. To fill this research gap, we conducted a cross-sectional survey with 553 employees from Germany. Our survey provides multiple insights into the relationships between perceived data sensitivity and willingness to disclose in the employment context. Among other things, we show that the perceived sensitivity of certain types of data differs substantially from existing studies in other contexts. Moreover, currently used legal and contextual distinctions between different types of data do not accurately reflect the subtleties of employees’ perceptions. Instead, using 62 different data elements, we identified four groups of personal data that better reflect the multi-dimensionality of perceptions. However, previously found common disclosure antecedents in the context of online privacy do not seem to affect them. We further identified three groups of employees that differ in their perceived data sensitivity and willingness to disclose, but neither in their privacy beliefs nor in their demographics. Our findings thus provide employers, policy makers, and researchers with a better understanding of employees’ privacy perceptions and serve as a basis for future targeted research on specific types of personal data and employees.

show abstract

Section: Introductioncontrasting

confidence: 60%

Section: Perceived Data Sensitivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Perceived Data Sensitivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Employees’ privacy perceptions: exploring the dimensionality and antecedents of personal data sensitivity and willingness to disclose

Tolsdorf

Reinhardt

Iacono

2022

Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Cultural aspects determine how a particular technology is used or a participant's approach to negotiation [87,88]. Different cultural starting points in a dispute resolution can positively or negatively affect the course of negotiation [89]. Based on experience from other fields-see e.g., [90]-it can be assumed that the trust in mediated negotiation is related to the particular cultural context.…”

Section: Limitations Of the E-negotiation Methods Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Business E-NeGotiAtion: A Method Using a Genetic Algorithm for Online Dispute Resolution in B2B Relationships

Šimková

Smutný

2021

JTAER

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An opportunity to resolve disputes as an out-of-court settlement through computer-mediated communication is usually easier, faster, and cheaper than filing an action in court. Artificial intelligence and law (AI & Law) research has gained importance in this area. The article presents a design of the E-NeGotiAtion method for assisted negotiation in business to business (B2B) relationships, which uses a genetic algorithm for selecting the most appropriate solution(s). The aim of the article is to present how the method is designed and contribute to knowledge on online dispute resolution (ODR) with a focus on B2B relationships. The evaluation of the method consisted of an embedded single-case study, where participants from two countries simulated the realities of negotiation between companies. For comparison, traditional negotiation via e-mail was also conducted. The evaluation confirms that the proposed E-NeGotiAtion method quickly achieves solution(s), approaching the optimal solution on which both sides can decide, and also very importantly, confirms that the method facilitates negotiation with the partner and creates a trusted result. The evaluation demonstrates that the proposed method is economically efficient for parties of the dispute compared to negotiation via e-mail. For a more complicated task with five or more products, the E-NeGotiAtion method is significantly more suitable than negotiation via e-mail for achieving a resolution that favors one side or the other as little as possible. In conclusion, it can be said that the proposed method fulfills the definition of the dual-task of ODR—it resolves disputes and builds confidence.

show abstract

Shared decision-making in maternity care in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study

Alruwaili,

Crawford,

Fooladi

2024

Midwifery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Perception of Information Sensitivity for Internet Users in Saudi Arabia

Cited by 7 publications

References 36 publications

Employees’ privacy perceptions: exploring the dimensionality and antecedents of personal data sensitivity and willingness to disclose

Employees’ privacy perceptions: exploring the dimensionality and antecedents of personal data sensitivity and willingness to disclose

Business E-NeGotiAtion: A Method Using a Genetic Algorithm for Online Dispute Resolution in B2B Relationships

Shared decision-making in maternity care in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About