2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05502-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception of lexical stress cued by low-frequency pitch and insights into speech perception in noise for cochlear implant users and normal hearing adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, significant HI/DI correlations with music perception measures might be linked to the non-linguistic characteristics of both stimuli. Previous studies suggest that tests based on non-linguistic LF pitch stimuli may better estimate its significant role in music perception whilst tests with linguistic stimuli may better reflect its role in speech perception [ 28 , 29 ]. Nevertheless, the significant effects of LF pitch perception on both speech-in-noise and music perception performance become significantly evident in the overall group similarly with a previous study conducted by Fowler et al in adults [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, significant HI/DI correlations with music perception measures might be linked to the non-linguistic characteristics of both stimuli. Previous studies suggest that tests based on non-linguistic LF pitch stimuli may better estimate its significant role in music perception whilst tests with linguistic stimuli may better reflect its role in speech perception [ 28 , 29 ]. Nevertheless, the significant effects of LF pitch perception on both speech-in-noise and music perception performance become significantly evident in the overall group similarly with a previous study conducted by Fowler et al in adults [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, and despite their remarkable success at restoring speech perception, several limitations remain. Current CI users have limited pitch perception, 99 frequency resolution, 100 and dynamic range 101 . These challenges in extracting basic sound properties translate into limitations that include the ability of the user to understand speech in noisy environments, 102 locate sound sources, 103 and enjoy music 104 .…”
Section: The Cochlear Implantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the huge success of CIs, there remain significant limitations for even the best-performing users ( Wilson, 2017 ), as well as substantial variation in performance between individuals ( Tamati et al, 2019 ). For example, CI users have limited pitch perception ( D’Alessandro and Mancini, 2019 ), frequency resolution ( O’Neill et al, 2019 ), and dynamic range ( Bento et al, 2005 ). These issues in extracting basic sound properties translate into limitations in real-world listening, with CI users often struggling to understand speech in challenging listening conditions ( Hazrati and Loizou, 2012 ), struggling to locate sounds ( Dorman et al, 2016 ), and having substantially reduced music appreciation ( McDermott, 2004 ; Dritsakis et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Electro-haptic Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%