Perception of Team Based Learning on Medical and Health Terminology Course

Azizam, Nor Azmaniza; Maon, Siti Noorsuriani; Dzulkipli, Mohd Redhuan; Aziz, Nor Intan Shamimi Abdul

doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i13/6243

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The main objective of this study is to analyse and determine the validity and reliability of the TBL-SAI and TPS in measuring students' perception of TBL and PBL application in the course. TBL and PBL have gradually become important teaching approaches in healthcare and medical curricula (Burgess et al, 2020;Ibrahim & Sleem, 2019), namely the fields of nursing (Alberti et al, 2021;Burton et al, 2021), pharmacy (Nation, 2016;Tweddell et al, 2020), and health management (Azizam et al, 2019) in recent years. Simultaneously, UiTM has been highly encouraging innovative delivery methods in teaching and assessments, such as online learning, blended learning, and PBL.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the Instruments Measuring Team-based Learning Strategy

Azizam¹,

Aziz²,

Maon³

2022

IJARPED

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main objective of this study is to analyse the reliability and validity of psychometric properties of two instruments: Team-Based Learning Student Assessment Instrument (TBL-SAI) and the Team Performance Survey (TPS). A 33-item TBL-SAI and an 18-item TPS were administered to investigate undergraduate students' perception of TBL and PBL incorporated in the medical terminology course were recruited. A Cronbach's alpha test and a principal component analysis were administered in establishing the reliability and validity of the instruments. The study's results showed that Cronbach's alpha values were 0.88 (TBL-SAI) and 0.98 (TPS), indicating high levels of reliability of both instruments. PCA also discovered that the TBL-SAI scale extracted nine components with all items' factor loading greater than 0.60, except for the first and second items in the accountability domain, and the third item in the learning preference domain. Meanwhile, the TPS scale extracted one component with all items loaded more than 0.6, suggesting both TBL-SAI and TPS scales were appraising the factors intended to be measured. Both TBL-SAI and TPS demonstrated acceptable levels of internal consistency and construct validity in assessing students' perception of TBL and PBL in the course.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%