2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception of Voice in the Transgender Client

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
53
3
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
53
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…6,15 Subjective ratings of voice quality perception can be administered through informal assessment, observation, questionnaire, or standardized subjective rating scales. Standardized scales allow listeners to rate voice perception on various vocal qualities, including grade, harshness, breathiness, strain, and asthenic.…”
Section: Measuring Voicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…6,15 Subjective ratings of voice quality perception can be administered through informal assessment, observation, questionnaire, or standardized subjective rating scales. Standardized scales allow listeners to rate voice perception on various vocal qualities, including grade, harshness, breathiness, strain, and asthenic.…”
Section: Measuring Voicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…McNeill et al (2008) 15 used interval scales to measure listener perception of transgender voice and compared ratings by speech-language pathologists (SLPs) with those of naive listeners. Ratings of overall quality by naive listeners and SLP listeners were strongly correlated (r ¼ 0.97).…”
Section: Measuring Voicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…14 In addition, although SFF is important for gender association, M-F TS individuals' own satisfaction with their voices is not necessarily related to their SFFs. 15 Voice features other than mean SFF, such as intonation pattern, articulation, formant patterns, and manner of speaking, are also gender markers. 1,13,16,17 Gelfer and Schofield 5 showed that, in addition to a higher SFF, M-F TS individuals who were perceived as females had a higher upper SFF limit than those perceived as males.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%