2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.kjss.2016.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception on justice, trust and tax compliance behavior in Malaysia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
55
1
20

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
55
1
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent empirical evidence using selfemployed taxpayers in Austria also confirmed the direct influence of trust in authority on tax compliance (Kogler, Muehlbacher, & Kirchler, 2015). More recently, Faizal et al, (2017) proposed and confirmed the effect of trust in authority on tax compliance in Malaysia, as well as Siglé, et al, (2018) among corporate taxpayers in Netherland; Damayanti and Martono (2018) and Andyarini, et al, (2019) among individual taxpayers in Indonesia; Ayuba, et al (2018) among SMEs in Nigeria and da Silva et al (2019).…”
Section: Influence Of Trust In Authorities On Tax Compliancementioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Recent empirical evidence using selfemployed taxpayers in Austria also confirmed the direct influence of trust in authority on tax compliance (Kogler, Muehlbacher, & Kirchler, 2015). More recently, Faizal et al, (2017) proposed and confirmed the effect of trust in authority on tax compliance in Malaysia, as well as Siglé, et al, (2018) among corporate taxpayers in Netherland; Damayanti and Martono (2018) and Andyarini, et al, (2019) among individual taxpayers in Indonesia; Ayuba, et al (2018) among SMEs in Nigeria and da Silva et al (2019).…”
Section: Influence Of Trust In Authorities On Tax Compliancementioning
confidence: 79%
“…In order to confirm whether or not the propositions of the Slippery Slope Framework hold in real world situations, various studies were undertaken for validation. For example, in Europe (Kastlunger, et al, 2013;Kirchler, et al, 2008;Kogler, et al, 2013;Pellizzari & Rizzi, 2014;Siglé, et al, 2018;Wahl, et al, 2010) and later Asia (Andyarini, Subroto, & Subekti, 2019;Batrancea & Nichita, 2014;Damayanti & Martono, 2018;Faizal et al, 2017;Mardhiah, Miranti & Tanton, 2019), Africa (Ayuba, Saad & Ariffin, 2018;Mas' ud, et al, 2015;Mas'ud, et al, 2014), and South America (da Silva, Guerreiro & Flores, 2019). However, most of these validations are country specific, except a few such as Mas' ud, et al, (2015) and Mas'ud, et al, (2014) that have a continental focus with emphasis on Africa.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dalam paradigma tradisional perilaku wajib pajak dianalisis sebagai individu yang berpotensi melakukan tindakan kejahatan sehingga pemerintah perlu mengantisipasi dengan pemeriksaan dan pemberian sanksi (Alm, Cherry, Jones, & McKee, 2010;Faizal, Palil, Maelah, & Ramli, 2017;Jimenez & Iyer, 2016;Pickhardt & Prinz, 2014). Pandangan tersebut jelas merugikan wajib pajak, kare na menjadikan wajib pajak sebagai pihak yang hanya mempunyai kewajiban tanpa boleh menuntut hak sebagai kompensasi atas pembayaran pajak tersebut.…”
Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanunclassified