Perceptions and characteristics of the mentor role in research capacity building programs for clinicians: A scoping review

Abstract

Background Research capacity building programs are in facilitating clinicians’ engagement with best-practice research. Benefits of research capacity in healthcare locations have far reaching benefits including individuals, communities, and health services. Commonly, research capacity building programs include an element of mentoring, to facilitate experiential learning. The role of the mentor is diverse, thus this review aimed to uncover the role and perceptions of mentors, from both mentees and mentors. Methods A systematic copsing review was conducted, using the five-stage framework of Arksey and O’Malley (2005). CINAHL, Embase, PubMed and Scopus databases were searched. Thematic analysis was conducted to reconcile the data against the aims and objectives. Results A total of 25 articles were included for analysis. Analysis of data related to the mentor perception found two main themes and associated subthemes; Measures of success (Facilitate opportunities, understand the research process and embed research into routine practice) and Operational Factors (understanding their role and multi-modal delivery) For the mentees, analysis uncovered two main themes and associated subthemes; Ideal mentor attributes (appropriately experienced, regular contact, approachable and enthusiastic ), and Desired outcomes (increased confidence in research, facilitate collaboration, and support to do research). Conclusions The value and importance of the mentor in research capacity building is clear. This article provides a framework for the role of the mentor in research capacity building programs.