1999
DOI: 10.1080/08923649909527034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptions and effects of image transmissions during internet‐based training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another restriction may have been response delays not uncommon during peak usage periods on the Internet, in contrast to the immediate responses possible with a stand-alone computer; With packet-based networks, variable delays cause latency problems in the receipt of learning material, particularly with graphic images. Previous research has demonsti-ated a slight decrement in learning due to inherent delays of transmitting complex graphics over the Internet (Wisher & Cumow, 1999).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another restriction may have been response delays not uncommon during peak usage periods on the Internet, in contrast to the immediate responses possible with a stand-alone computer; With packet-based networks, variable delays cause latency problems in the receipt of learning material, particularly with graphic images. Previous research has demonsti-ated a slight decrement in learning due to inherent delays of transmitting complex graphics over the Internet (Wisher & Cumow, 1999).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With packet-based networks, variable delays cause latency problems in the receipt of learning material, particularly with graphic images. Previous research has demonstrated a slight decrement in learning due to inherent delays of transmitting complex graphics over the Internet (Wisher and Curnow, 1999).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cabero (2007) summarizes the possibilities of videos accentuating the high number of alternatives to visualise them and their adaptation to any educational level, as well as pointing out their limitations such as favoring passive attitudes. With the evolution of digital technology and fast access streaming video channels via the Internet, video has moved from being an important element to being considered as teaching methodology, with the increase in the number of settings which use dynamic image as a captivating element for students' attention , to the point that some authors (Choi & Johnson, 2007;Shyu, 2000;Wisher & Curnow, 1999) It should be noted that it is proposed that videos are used as complementary components classroom sessions. Some studies have shown that when used as a complement, positive results are obtained in student performance (Dupuis, Coutu & Laneuville, 2013;Traphagan, Kusera & Kishi, 2010;Wieling & Hofman, 2010;Williams, Birch & Hancock, 2012), whereas when used simply to replace class sessions there is not the same improvement in learning outcomes (Giannakos & Vlamos, 2013;McKinney, Dyck & Luber, 2008).…”
Section: Educational Videosmentioning
confidence: 99%