2015
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptions and Preferences of Patients with Terminal Lung Cancer and Family Caregivers about DNR

Abstract: Background: Patients with terminal lung cancer and their families are challenged and stressed with the end of life discussions. Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders are a critical part of such discussions.Objective: To understand the perceptions and preferences of patients with terminal lung cancer and their family caregivers around DNR discussions. .Methods: Our quantitative component consisted of a pen-and-paper questionnaire that was followed by a ‘think aloud’ process to capture perceptions of participants in r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Key principles include respecting personal choice, engaging in prior discussions with the patient or their guardian, obtaining consent, using standard methods to designate a patient's DNR order (e.g., special bracelets), acknowledging the patient's right to change their decision, and documenting the patient's preferences (6,8). Previous research has shown varied perspectives on DNR decision-making among nurses and physicians, with reports of ambiguity and contradictory documentation (9,10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key principles include respecting personal choice, engaging in prior discussions with the patient or their guardian, obtaining consent, using standard methods to designate a patient's DNR order (e.g., special bracelets), acknowledging the patient's right to change their decision, and documenting the patient's preferences (6,8). Previous research has shown varied perspectives on DNR decision-making among nurses and physicians, with reports of ambiguity and contradictory documentation (9,10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%