Perceptions of Canadian Armed Forces Health Services health care professionals on cognitive assessment processes

JonesChelsea,; Smith-MacDonaldLorraine,; Brémault‐Phillips, Suzette

doi:10.3138/jmvfh-2020-0066

Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health

2021

DOI: 10.3138/jmvfh-2020-0066

|View full text |Cite

Perceptions of Canadian Armed Forces Health Services health care professionals on cognitive assessment processes

JonesChelsea JonesChelsea

Smith-MacDonaldLorraine Smith-MacDonaldLorraine

Suzette Brémault‐Phillips

Abstract: Lay Summary Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) Service Members (SMs) experience mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI), which can affect cognitive functioning. Adequate cognitive functioning is needed to perform military duties safely and function in all aspects of life. A standardized process that includes cognitive screen/assessment within a mTBI rehabilitation strategy is not widely used within Canadian Forces Health Services (CFHS). A qualitative thematic analysis nested within an implementation science approach w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

A Scoping Review of Implementation Science Studies in the Field of Traumatic Brain Injury: State of the Science and Future Directions

Hyzak,

Riccardi,

Kinney

et al. 2024

Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Implementation research is essential to accelerating the public health benefits of innovations in health settings. However, the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2022 report identified a lag in published implementation research applied to traumatic brain injury (TBI). Our objectives were to characterize implementation science studies published to date in TBI clinical care and rehabilitation and provide recommendations for future directions. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Articles published between 2011 and 2023 were identified (MEDLINE, PubMed, PsychInfo, and Web of Science), and included if the study focused on the TBI population, measured at least one Proctor (2011) implementation outcome and aligned with implementation research designs. Data were charted using an extraction template. Results: Of the 38 articles, 76% were published between 2018 and 2023. About 37% of articles were in the pre-implementation phase, and 57.9% were in the implementation phase. Over half of articles used a theory, model, or framework to guide the research. Fifteen studies were descriptive, 10 were qualitative, 7 were mixed methods, and 4 were randomized controlled trials. Most studies investigated implementation outcomes regarding national guidelines following TBI or TBI symptom management. Adoption (42.1%) and fidelity (42.1%) were the most commonly studied implementation outcomes, followed by feasibility (18.4%), acceptability (13.2%), and penetration (10.5%). Only 55% of studies used or tested the effectiveness of one or more implementation strategies, with training and education used most commonly, followed by data warehousing techniques. Conclusions: Future research should prioritize the selection and investigation of implementation strategy effectiveness and mechanisms across contexts of care and use implementation research reporting standards to improve study rigor. Additionally, collaborative efforts between researchers, community partners, individuals with TBI, and their care partners could improve the equitable translation of innovations across service contexts.

show abstract

A Scoping Review of Implementation Science Studies in the Field of Traumatic Brain Injury: State of the Science and Future Directions

Hyzak,

Riccardi,

Kinney

et al. 2024

Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Perceptions of Canadian Armed Forces Health Services health care professionals on cognitive assessment processes

Cited by 1 publication

References 27 publications

A Scoping Review of Implementation Science Studies in the Field of Traumatic Brain Injury: State of the Science and Future Directions

A Scoping Review of Implementation Science Studies in the Field of Traumatic Brain Injury: State of the Science and Future Directions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About