2017
DOI: 10.1080/10508414.2017.1365609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptions of Cockpit Configurations: A Culture and Gender Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kokpitteki cinsiyet konfigürasyonlarına bağlı olarak yolcuların uçma istekliliği incelendiğinde, yolcuların otonom (pilotsuz) kokpitten ziyade kokpitinde cinsiyetinden bağımsız olarak bir pilot bulunan uçakla uçmak istediği anlaşılmıştır. Ancak erkekler, kokpitte iki kadın pilot olduğunda da uçmaya daha az istekli olmuşlardır (Mehta, Rice, Winter ve Eudy, 2017). Ayrıca kadın ve erkek pilotların yolcular tarafından farklı algılanabileceği ve kadınların performansının var olandan daha abartılı algılandığı bulunmuştur.…”
Section: Kapılar Açıldıktan Sonraunclassified
“…Kokpitteki cinsiyet konfigürasyonlarına bağlı olarak yolcuların uçma istekliliği incelendiğinde, yolcuların otonom (pilotsuz) kokpitten ziyade kokpitinde cinsiyetinden bağımsız olarak bir pilot bulunan uçakla uçmak istediği anlaşılmıştır. Ancak erkekler, kokpitte iki kadın pilot olduğunda da uçmaya daha az istekli olmuşlardır (Mehta, Rice, Winter ve Eudy, 2017). Ayrıca kadın ve erkek pilotların yolcular tarafından farklı algılanabileceği ve kadınların performansının var olandan daha abartılı algılandığı bulunmuştur.…”
Section: Kapılar Açıldıktan Sonraunclassified
“…Western cultures (i.e., United States) are much more individualist than Eastern cultures' collectivism (e.g., Asian and the Middle East). Individuals' emotional responses and behaviorisms towards autonomous technology have been identified through ethnographical research (Mehta, Rice, Winter, & Eudy, 2017;Srite & Karahanna, 2006). Specifically, collectivistic societies generally will trust newer technology and are more willing to adopt it so long as it benefits the community as a whole (Haboucha, Ishaq, & Shiftan, 2017;Hofstede, 1980Hofstede, , 2001Markus & Kitayama, 1991;Mehta et al, 2017).…”
Section: Social Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many studies that have investigated the differences between American and Indian nationality potentially explained by individualistic and collectivist cultural views (Mehta, Rice, Winter, & Eudy, 2017;Rice, Mehta, Winter, & Oyman, 2015;Winter et al, 2015). Markus and Kitayama (1991) found that collectivist cultures, such as that of India, have an interdependent view of the self.…”
Section: Nationality and Cultural Considerations: India And The Unitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Lee and See (2004) suggest that ''trust may play a critical role in people's ability to accommodate the cognitive complexity and uncertainty that accompanies the move away from simple technologies'' (p. 51). Previous studies examined passengers' trust in autonomous operating systems Rice, Winter, Deaton, & Cremer, 2016) versus human-operated systems (Hughes, Rice, Trafimow, & Clayton, 2009;Mehta et al, 2017;Rice et al, 2014;Winter et al, 2015). Hughes et al (2009) reported that passengers had a more negative attitude toward autonomous autopilot systems as opposed to having human pilots controlling the aircraft, even when discounts were offered to those flying with an autopilot system.…”
Section: Expansion Of Technology Automation and Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%