2015
DOI: 10.5032/jae.2015.02204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptions of Critical Thinking, Task Value, Autonomy and Science Lab Self-efficacy: A Longitudinal Examination of Students' CASE Experience

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to begin examining the impact of the Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education (CASE). Under development since 2008, the curriculum is intended to integrate core academics and Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) into agricultural education programs. This longitudinal descriptive correlational study (N = 173) sought to examine the perceptions of students enrolled in a CASE course specific to the constructs of critical thinking, task value, autonomy, and science la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study addresses Research Priority Area Five: Efficient and effective agricultural education programs within the American Association for Agricultural Education's National Research Agenda (Roberts et al, 2016). Researchers have conducted several studies on CASE, including the challenges of preservice implementation (Wells et al, 2019), student development of critical thinking, task value, autonomy, and science lab self-efficacy (Velez et al, 2015), science teaching efficacy (Ulmer et al, 2013), teachers' intentions to integrate science into agriculture classrooms (Pauley et al, 2019). However, limited research has been done on preservice teachers attending CASE institutes or what skills are gained through CASE professional development.…”
Section: Purpose and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study addresses Research Priority Area Five: Efficient and effective agricultural education programs within the American Association for Agricultural Education's National Research Agenda (Roberts et al, 2016). Researchers have conducted several studies on CASE, including the challenges of preservice implementation (Wells et al, 2019), student development of critical thinking, task value, autonomy, and science lab self-efficacy (Velez et al, 2015), science teaching efficacy (Ulmer et al, 2013), teachers' intentions to integrate science into agriculture classrooms (Pauley et al, 2019). However, limited research has been done on preservice teachers attending CASE institutes or what skills are gained through CASE professional development.…”
Section: Purpose and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CASE curricula are designed to be an innovative and integrated approach to teaching and learning in SBAE settings. It is guided by an inquiry-based, scientific approach to teaching in SBAE programs (Velez et al, 2015). This interdisciplinary curriculum allows teachers and students to learn complex systems within a familiar context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McKim et al (2018) found CASE-certified teachers had slightly higher perceived science knowledge than non-CASE-certified teachers. CASE curricula have shown to be beneficial to teachers who are developing their innovative classroom (Velez et al, 2015). As the integration of core academic subjects into SBAE continues to be struggle for some teachers, research into innovative programs like CASE continues to remain important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Totten et al (1991) suggested that collaboration allows students to become critical thinkers by engaging in discussion and taking responsibility for their own learning. With the recent interest concerning students' critical thinking abilities within the agricultural education literature (Davis & Jayaratne, 2015;Perry et al, 2015;Perry et al, 2014;Ricketts & Rudd, 2005;Velez et al, 2015), effective communication and collaboration in the learning environment is paramount for student success (Wagner, 2008).…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%