2013
DOI: 10.4236/ojn.2013.32024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptions of cultural competency of undergraduate nursing students

Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the level of cultural competence of undergraduate nursing students at a large Midwestern University. Background: Developing cultural competence of nurses is critical to meet the needs of our growing diverse society. Methods: A convenience sample of 150 undergraduate nursing students completed a one-time questionnaire assessing students' cultural competence. Results: Nursing students' rated their overall knowledge and comfort moderate to poor with only 28% rated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The students’ self-perception of cultural competence ranged from adequate to inadequate, with some participants suggesting specific strategies and attitudes to overcome their perceived lack of competence including respect, empathy and active listening. Previous studies have analyzed student nurses’ self-perception of cultural competency, describing it as poor to moderate [ 29 , 43 ], with the students perceiving that their ability to provide culturally congruent care gradually increased throughout their training, leading to implications of the need for continued education relating to this concept [ 43 ]. Our participants were able to express specific learning needs and gaps in their training regarding their ability to provide culturally and linguistically appropriate care, including a lack of practical experience and exposure to culturally diverse patients, both in a controlled setting such as clinical simulation and on placement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The students’ self-perception of cultural competence ranged from adequate to inadequate, with some participants suggesting specific strategies and attitudes to overcome their perceived lack of competence including respect, empathy and active listening. Previous studies have analyzed student nurses’ self-perception of cultural competency, describing it as poor to moderate [ 29 , 43 ], with the students perceiving that their ability to provide culturally congruent care gradually increased throughout their training, leading to implications of the need for continued education relating to this concept [ 43 ]. Our participants were able to express specific learning needs and gaps in their training regarding their ability to provide culturally and linguistically appropriate care, including a lack of practical experience and exposure to culturally diverse patients, both in a controlled setting such as clinical simulation and on placement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the means of providing safe and culturally competent quality care should be central components of nursing education [ 7 , 28 ]. Yet, previous studies have suggested that student nurses often lack the confidence to provide culturally competent care [ 29 , 30 ]. Furthermore, the concept of transcultural nursing care continues to be insufficiently addressed in the field of nursing education [ 1 , 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the study was conducted on a small sample size compared to other studies [ 62 , 71 ], meaningful insights about cultural awareness among pharmacy students and educators were obtained. The mixed-methods approach allowed researchers to gain the advantages of the amalgamated quantitative and qualitative modalities, thus yielding a better understanding and a more holistic set of evidence [ 72 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global mean score for the J‐CCCHS among Japanese nurses (N = 7494) was 1.85 (SD = .52). Notably, this was much lower than initially reported by developers of the instrument (M = 3.60, SD = 0.59; M = 4.42, SD = 0.48) or by a more recent report (M = 3.34, SD = .43) (Caffrey et al, ; Von Ah & Cassara, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%