Perceptions of Femininity in Leadership: Modern Trend or Classic Component?

Abstract

Recently, leadership theorists have commonly suggested that leaders should demonstrate new, arguably feminine, leadership behaviors. This contrasts with traditional stereotypes of leadership as strictly masculine. However, leadership research has a long history of recognizing two categories of leadership behaviors, initiation of structure and consideration, which appear to reflect stereotypically masculine and feminine behaviors. In the current study, 24 undergraduate volunteers rated traits of purported leaders based solely upon their viewing of the leaders' faces. These faces were visually impoverished so that the raters had to rely on implicit personality theories of leaders to guide their ratings. The results demonstrate that participants' ratings of purported leaders' masculinity and femininity indeed correlate very closely with their ratings of initiation of structure and consideration respectively.

Breaking Glass: Toward a Gendered Analysis of Entrepreneurial Leadership

“…In recent years, the field of leadership has shifted in focus in three significant ways as it has begun to move from a positivist/post‐positivist mind‐set emphasizing command, control, and hierarchy toward newer models more reflective of the economic, demographic, and competitive changes characterizing the modern workplace (Johanson ; Kanter ). First, there has been a shift in interest away from the personal characteristics of the leader from an individualized, heroic conceptualization toward leadership as a role incorporating interaction with social and organizational context (Leitch, McMullan, and Harrison ; Thorpe et al.…”

Taking on power: Women leaders in evangelical mission organizations

“…Communal behaviors include those that are “warm, supportive, kind, and helpful” (Carli and Eagly, 2011: 108). Agentic behavior is more highly valued in a leader than is communal behavior (Johanson, 2008). This connection is so strong that (Brenner, Tomkiewicz, and Schein, 1989: 668) referred to it as the “think manager—think male” effect.…”

Women’s leadership aspirations

“…While there are signs of progress as noted above, researchers continue to find an implicit association of leadership with gendered (male) descriptors. A study done by Johanson (2008) helped explain why many most people still think "male" when they think leader. In Johanson's study, participants were asked to sort a lengthy list of leader characteristics between structural taking.…”