Perceptions of goods, services and eco‐cultural attributes of Native Americans and Caucasians in Idaho

Abstract

Understanding perceptions of how people value environmental resources is critical to conservation and management of ecosystems. We used interviews to examine perceptions and valuations of goods, services, and eco-cultural attributes of Native Americans and Caucasians attending an American Indian festival. The Native Americans interviewed were younger, achieved lower levels of education, and had lower mean incomes than did the Caucasians. There were no significant differences in the percentage of Native Americans and Caucasians engaged in consumptive and nonconsumptive activities, although a significantly greater percentage of Native Americans engaged in religious/cultural activities than did Caucasians. Although the relative ratings differed, the most important characteristics for all three types of activities were clean air, unpolluted water, no visible smog in air, and appears unspoiled, which represent both goods and services (the former two) and eco-cultural attributes (the latter two). For nearly all characteristics, Native Americans rated them higher than did Caucasians. O , is a Distinguished Professor of Biology at Rutgers University. She is an ecologist, human ecologist, behavioral biologist, and ecotoxicologist. For the past ten years, she has been involved with the development of ecological risk methods and bioindicators, including evaluating attitudes toward recreational, ecological services, and future land uses.

Mapping socio‐ecological systems in Idaho: Spatial patterns and analytical considerations

“…The character of natural ecosystems fundamentally and uniquely underly the traditional cultural and spiritual perspectives of Idaho indigenous tribes. For instance, Burger (2012) found that Bannock‐Shoshoni tribal members were more likely to value complex ecosystem characteristics (e.g., food chains) and emergent processes (e.g., species diversity) than local Caucasians in Idaho. Tribal perspectives, however, have become increasingly incorporated into management decisions concerning resources on western public lands, and may be further influenced and informed by reliable SEZs for these regions.…”