Perceptions of Graduate Students at the University of São Paulo about Plagiarism Practices in Academic Works

Abstract

Our objective was to identify the understanding of theoretical aspects and the interpretation of practical situations that a sample of 3,623 graduate students (Population = 22,438) at the University of São Paulo (Brazil) have regarding academic plagiarism. The survey used an electronic questionnaire containing 30 multiple choice questions developed from the literature concerning the concept and definition of plagiarism, occurrence modality, types of plagiarism, reasons for occurrence, standards and preventive actions adopted. We identified that the fact of respondents agreeing or disagreeing with the theoretical-conceptual characteristics of plagiarism did not make a difference in their capacity of correctly assessing practical situations characterizing plagiarism. Moreover, the agreement or disagreement responses regarding the concepts of plagiarism were observed not to differ among the respondents who had been trained to use references and citations. However, the same respondents correctly interpret practical situations characterizing plagiarism. Therefore, this study suggests that there is a gap between theoretical and practical knowledge regarding plagiarism for graduate students. Although the technical training related to the correct use of research sources is an important prerequisite in the capacity-building process, it does not seem to be enough to prevent plagiarism practices.

Readymade Solutions and Students’ Appetite for Plagiarism as Challenges for Online Learning

“…Additionally, sanctions do not seem to be able to prevent people from being willing to plagiarize [50], and the technical training related to the correct use of research resources does not seem to be sufficient in preventing plagiarism [56].…”

Examining the Role of Gender and Educational Level in Committing Plagiarism by Iranian EFL Graduate Students

“…In some situations, it is reported that even training courses may not necessarily produce desired results. For example, in Brazil, Krokoscz and Ferreira (2019) pointed to a gap between theoretical and practical knowledge regarding plagiarism for graduate students. They emphasized that although the technical training related to the correct use of research sources is necessary in the capacity-building process, it is not sufficient to prevent plagiarism practices.…”