1984
DOI: 10.1177/027347538400600312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptions of Interviewers' Evaluative Criteria for the Initial Job Interview: Implications for Marketing Our Students

Abstract: Two hundred and sixty job interviewers and 110 marketing students rated the importance of 25 positive and 25 negative attributes of the interviewee in the initial job interview. Factor analysis of the interviewers' ratings indicated that they tended to focus on seven factors (evaluative criteria). Students accurately perceived the importance of four of these factors, but significantly misperceived the importance of the other three. No support for a negativity bias was found. Implications for grooming the stude… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Factors such as nonverbal behaviours and interview anxiety impact the interviewees' ability to deliver employability stories orally in the presence of interviewers (Feiler and Powell, 2016). Interviewers' preconceptions, bias and hirability assumptions also have a direct effect on interview performance ratings (Florea et al, 2019;Lammers et al, 1984;Peterson, 1997;Williams, 2008;Silvester and Chapman, 1996). Additionally, interviews are interactive activities where the dynamics between interviewers and interviewees may alter the results (Brosy et al, 2020;Budnick et al, 2015Budnick et al, , 2019.…”
Section: Evaluating Interview Narratives Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Factors such as nonverbal behaviours and interview anxiety impact the interviewees' ability to deliver employability stories orally in the presence of interviewers (Feiler and Powell, 2016). Interviewers' preconceptions, bias and hirability assumptions also have a direct effect on interview performance ratings (Florea et al, 2019;Lammers et al, 1984;Peterson, 1997;Williams, 2008;Silvester and Chapman, 1996). Additionally, interviews are interactive activities where the dynamics between interviewers and interviewees may alter the results (Brosy et al, 2020;Budnick et al, 2015Budnick et al, , 2019.…”
Section: Evaluating Interview Narratives Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interviewers' preconceptions, bias and hirability assumptions also have a direct effect on interview performance ratings (Florea et al. , 2019; Lammers et al. , 1984; Peterson, 1997; Williams, 2008; Silvester and Chapman, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The arithmetic mean was calculated for each item and used as the self-reported importance measure, which was then rank ordered to indicate overall importance. This basic methodology has been extended by performing factor analysis (Lammers et al 1984) to reduce the number of items to fewer dimensions, by using conjoint analysis (Boatwright and Stamps 1988) or regression analysis (Tomkovick, Erffmeyer, and Hietpas 1996) to derive the importance ratings, by testing differences between means with ANOVA (Leach and Sandall 1995), and by indirectly soliciting evaluations of skills with Policy Capturing techniques (Tomkovick, Erffmeyer, and Hietpas 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%