Perceptions of mistreatment among trainees vary at different stages of clinical training

Abstract

BackgroundMistreatment of trainees remains a frequently reported phenomenon in medical education. One barrier to creating an educational culture of respect and professionalism may be a lack of alignment in the perceptions of mistreatment among different learners. Through the use of clinical vignettes, our aim was to assess the perceptions of trainees toward themes of potential mistreatment at different stages of training.MethodsBased on observations from external experts embedded in the clinical learning environment, six thematic areas of potential mistreatment were identified: verbal abuse, specialty-choice discrimination, non-educational tasks, withholding/denying learning opportunities, neglect and gender/racial insensitivity. Corresponding clinical vignettes were created and distributed to 1) medical students, 2) incoming interns, 3) residents/fellows. Perceptions of the appropriateness of the interactions depicted in the vignettes were measured on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores were categorized into neutral or appropriate (≤3) or inappropriate (i.e. mistreatment) (>3) and compared using chi-squared tests.ResultsFour hundred twenty seven trainees participated (182 students, 120 interns, 125 residents/fellows). Proportions of students perceiving mistreatment differed significantly from those of interns and residents/fellows in domains of verbal abuse, specialty discrimination and gender/racial insensitivity (p < 0.05). In scenarios comparing interns to residents/fellows, no significant differences were noted in perceptions of mistreatment in the domains of non-educational tasks, withholding learning and neglect.ConclusionsPerceptions of mistreatment differ at different developmental stages of medical training. After exposure to the clinical learning environment, perceptions of incoming interns did not differ from those of residents/fellows, implicating clinical rotations as a key period in indoctrinating students into the prevailing culture. More longitudinal studies are needed to confirm or better examine this phenomenon.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0853-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Gender-based discrimination is prevalent in the integrated vascular trainee experience and serves as a predictor of burnout

“…during training, which is similar to reported percentages among general surgery residents, nonsurgical medical trainees, and nonmedical professionals. [22][23][24][25] In a recent study by McKinley et al 11 that surveyed general surgery, medicine, and anesthesia residents across two institutions, rates of GBDB ranged from 30% to 36% across the three specialties, which is slightly lower than the 38% we found. In this manuscript, GBDB was the most commonly cited negative workplace experience among female integrated residents, and the perceived consequences were meaningful.…”

Competence vs. Identity, Trainees vs. Physicians: How COVID-19 Has Highlighted Role Confusion in Residency Training

“…Residents are expected to be professionals and develop an altruistic attitude towards their patients and colleagues and are often expected to take on the responsibilities of autonomous physicians. Yet it is also recognized that residents and fellows are a group that requires special protections, such as the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education’s (ACGME) 80-h limit [ 8 ], as without such protections trainees may be taken advantage of or mistreated [ 9 ]. Trainees also lack privileges attained by post-graduate physicians such as financial compensation or ability to negotiate, or flexibility with job requirements, mandatory attendance of didactics, and limited availability of sick leave or child-care.…”

The Effect of the Educational Environment on the rate of Burnout among Postgraduate Medical Trainees – A Narrative Literature Review

“…The authors also reported an adjusted odds ratio for burnout associated with any mistreatment of 1.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.62, 2.42]. Kulayat et al 54 have suggested that perceptions of mistreatment vary along the duration of medical training, implicating clinical rotations in the indoctrination of students on the prevailing culture.…”