Perceptions of surgeons on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use at an urban tertiary hospital in Tanzania

Abstract

Background Surgical Site Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality among operated patients. In spite of the accessibility of universal and national guidelines for surgical prophylaxis, recent studies surveying the present routine of prophylaxis have demonstrated overutilization of a wide range antibacterial medication for a single patient. Few studies have shown qualitatively factors influencing this and perceptions of surgeons on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use. Unfortunately, none of these studies have been done in Tanzania. Objective To describe the perceptions of surgeons on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use at an urban tertiary hospital. Methods A qualitative study involving in-depth interviews with surgeons was conducted in English by the primary investigator. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Systematic text condensation by Malterud was used for data analysis. Findings Fourteen surgeons and obstetrics and gynaecologists participated. Their perceptions were summarized into three main categories: Inadequate data to support practice; one who sees the patient decides the antibiotic prophylaxis; prolonged antibiotic use for fear of unknown. The participants perceived that choice of antibiotic should be based on local hospital data for bacterial resistance pattern, however the hospital guidelines and data for surgical site infection rates are unknown. Fear of getting infection and anticipating complications led to prolonged antibiotics use. Conclusion The study provides an understanding of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use and its implementation challenges. This was partly expressed by unavailability of local data and guidelines to enhance practice. To improve this, there is a need of guidelines that incorporates local resistance surveillance data and enhanced antibiotic stewardship programmes. A strong consideration should be placed into ways to combat the fears of surgeons for complications, as these significantly affect the current practise with use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis.

Effectiveness of decision support tools on reducing antibiotic use for respiratory tract infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

“…Firstly, physicians may not fully adhere to the recommendations provided by the CDSs due to concerns about potential adverse outcomes. It is possible that the fear of missing a bacterial infection or the fear of adverse events may influence physicians’ decision-making processes, leading to a cautious approach to antibiotic prescribing ( Ashiru-Oredope et al, 2021 ; Mmari et al, 2021 ; Xu et al, 2021 ). Secondly, patient preferences and demands may also contribute to the observed effect.…”

“A breach in the protocol for no good reason”: a surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis experience in an Ethiopian academic medical center

“…Similarly, in those undergoing gastrectomy the prolonged use group had no reduction in the rate of SSI detection (Lee et al 2010 ). Whether it is benevolence for an individual patient, fear of the unknown or assumption that it decreases the rate of SSI, “extended” SAP should have no place in the modern evidence-based clinical practice (Mmari et al 2021 ; Broom et al 2018 ).…”