Perceptions of the impact of accountability on the role of principals.

Abstract

Calls for accountability in America's schools have created increased responsibilities for educational leaders. In this article, we describe and discuss a study of elementary, middle, and high school principals' perceptions of the state-wide educational accountability program in North Carolina. The respondents indicated that the state's accountability program has had its greatest impact on how they monitored student achievement, aligned the curriculum to the testing program, provided student remedial or tutorial opportunities, assigned teachers to grades levels or subjects, and protected instructional time. Views of some components, such as measures of school effectiveness, school safety standards, expectations and promotion standards for students, and financial bonuses received by staff members in schools that meet expected achievement standards, were viewed favorably. In contrast, the No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) requirement (incorporated into the state's accountability program), testing requirements for Limited English Proficiency students and special education students, the sanctions applied to schools that do not meet expected growth, and the school status designation labels that are applied to schools based upon student achievement were perceived more negatively. The predictable and unpredictable outcomes of a mandated accountability program on the perceptions (and behavior) of school principals create important considerations which are discussed for policy-makers and other professionals dealing with standards-based reform.

How Teachers Experience Principal Leadership: The Roles of Professional Community, Trust, Efficacy, and Shared Responsibility

“…However, when principals share leadership responsibilities with faculty members, they must also be ready to abide by actions initiated by teachers. Giving up control over key decisions becomes an increasingly high-stakes stance when the bottom line for accountability rests with the principal (Lyons & Algozzine, 2006). In addition, tentative principal-teacher efforts to share leadership are increasingly complicated by school districts' initiatives to involve teachers in leadership activities as well (Firestone & Martinez, 2007).…”

Interrelations between policymakers’ intentions and school agents’ interpretation of accountability policy in Israel

“…When principals are confronted with the demands of test-based accountability, they make their own interpretations regarding the implications for them and their schools (Louis, Leithwood, Wahlstrom, & Anderson, 2010;Seashore & Robinson, 2012). In general, principals who perceive testing policy to be supportive of their work and valuable to the school are more inclined to support and implement it (Lyons & Algozzine, 2006).…”

Which Hill Would You Die on?: Examining the Use of War-Normalizing Metaphors in Social Justice Leaders’ Discourse and Practice

“…The last three decades have been a hectic and challenging time for educational leaders who are committed to achieving equity and social justice in schools. In many jurisdictions across Canada, the United States, and elsewhere, high-stakes, high-stress, and low-support environments are the norm (Larsen, 2009; Lyons & Algozzine, 2006; Ryan, 2012) due to conflicting reforms and rigid accountability frames that eschew difference and equity, narrow curricula, and widen educational disparities (McMahon & Armstrong, 2014). In Ontario, the advent of conservative movements, such as the 1995 Common Sense Revolution, was a turning point for social justice work.…”