2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2881-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptions on the Causes of Individual and Fraudulent Co-offending: Views of Forensic Accountants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also very diverse on whether the actions are done individually or as a whole organisation. Individual factors are mostly explained by the fraud triangle theory, where personal motivations are often their common factors in committing these actions of fraud (Davis & Pesch, 2013;Free, 2015;Free et al, 2007;Spira & Page, 2003;Van Akkeren & Buckby, 2015). Highlighted international cases showcased leadership as a common factor that leads toward these actions of fraud (Engelbrecht, Heine, & Mahembe, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also very diverse on whether the actions are done individually or as a whole organisation. Individual factors are mostly explained by the fraud triangle theory, where personal motivations are often their common factors in committing these actions of fraud (Davis & Pesch, 2013;Free, 2015;Free et al, 2007;Spira & Page, 2003;Van Akkeren & Buckby, 2015). Highlighted international cases showcased leadership as a common factor that leads toward these actions of fraud (Engelbrecht, Heine, & Mahembe, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is further drilled down towards whole of the organization (Brennan & McGrath, 2007;Patelli & Pedrini, 2015). This tone at the top develops the organizational culture towards fraud prevention or fraud enabler as SM's actions and mindsets for fraud can encourage similar actions by others within organization (Akkeren & Buckby, 2017;Weber, 2010;Bruisnsma & Wemmenhove 2009;Brennan & McGrath 2007;Mohd-Sanusi et al, 2015).…”
Section: Senior Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Akkeren and Buckby, 2017 [21] A qualitative study is carried out, using the perceptions and experiences of forensic accountants, to determine the accounting fraud carried out by individuals and groups.…”
Section: Author/year Main Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of accounting fraud, using the Fraud Triangle tool, has been enriched and combined with contributions from other disciplines, such as ethics, morals and values [123,126], criminology, psychology and sociology [21,130], or combined with other frameworks such as the Crime Triangle (Mui and Mailley) [136].…”
Section: The Fraud Trianglementioning
confidence: 99%