2017
DOI: 10.1597/15-269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual Anchors and the Dispersion of Nasality Ratings

Abstract: Nasality rating reliability/dispersion was influenced by the presence and location of anchor stimuli. Consistent with absolute judgment theory, nasality ratings showed a strong end effect.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that inter-rater agreement seems to depend strongly on particular settings-only some showing certain improvement with linear weighting-makes it necessary to increase the number of training sessions between analysts. Furthermore, better agreement results could be achieved with the use of perceptual anchors, as it has been suggested in previous studies, 59,62 together with clearer definitions of the neutral baseline for the speaker population under evaluation. The search for acoustic correlates of some of the settings showing poorer agreement would be highly necessary as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The fact that inter-rater agreement seems to depend strongly on particular settings-only some showing certain improvement with linear weighting-makes it necessary to increase the number of training sessions between analysts. Furthermore, better agreement results could be achieved with the use of perceptual anchors, as it has been suggested in previous studies, 59,62 together with clearer definitions of the neutral baseline for the speaker population under evaluation. The search for acoustic correlates of some of the settings showing poorer agreement would be highly necessary as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…These limitations notwithstanding, the results of study 2 indicate that nasalance-based preclassification of oral–nasal balance disorders could be a promising new approach for overcoming the perennial reliability problems that often plague auditory-perceptual assessments of oral–nasal balance. The current literature emphasizes the importance of auditory-perceptual training for clinicians (John et al, 2006; Lee et al, 2009; Sell et al, 2009; Chapman et al, 2016; Galek and Watterson, 2017) but such extensive training may not be realistic or feasible for clinicians who do not work with individuals with oral–nasal balance disorders on a regular basis. Nasalance-based preclassification could potentially be a powerful diagnostic adjunct that may prove particularly helpful especially for new or inexperienced clinicians who are still learning the difficult task of assessing oral–nasal balance disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inter-rater reliability can be improved with practice and training (John et al, 2006; Lee et al, 2009; Sell et al, 2009; Chapman et al, 2016). Simply providing novice listeners with perceptual anchors (examples of mild, moderate, and severe hypernasality) also improves inter-rater reliability for hypernasality (Galek and Watterson, 2017). However, the half-life of such training effects is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%