1955
DOI: 10.1037/h0042504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual defense revisited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some research indicated an increase in threshold for both positively and negatively toned words. Others reported a decrease for both (Banks, 1959;Bevan, 1964;Blum, 1955;Davis, 1959;Dulaney, 1960;Gilchrist, Ludeman, & Lysok, 1954;McClelland & Liberman, 1949;Reece, 1954;Spence, 1957).…”
Section: Perceptual Defensementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some research indicated an increase in threshold for both positively and negatively toned words. Others reported a decrease for both (Banks, 1959;Bevan, 1964;Blum, 1955;Davis, 1959;Dulaney, 1960;Gilchrist, Ludeman, & Lysok, 1954;McClelland & Liberman, 1949;Reece, 1954;Spence, 1957).…”
Section: Perceptual Defensementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceptual defense is the unconscious mechanism that resists the recognition of threatening stimuli (Blum, 1955). The pioneer experiment on this phenomenon was the McGinnies "dirty word" experiment.…”
Section: Perceptual Defensementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anna Freud does not, however, mention which of these partly inconsistent hypotheses is less tentative, nor is the choice among them made easier by the fact that most, if not all, have received some measure of empirical confirmation. Thus the first hypothesis was supported by Fenz & Epstein ( I 962) and Inglis (1961), the fourth by Blum (1955) and Weinstock (1967), and the fifth by Byrne (1964), Conn & Crowne (1964), Kogan (1956), Palmer (1968), etc. Moreover, experimental support has also been found for other non-psychoanalytic hypotheses ; for example, the hypothesis that the choice of defence is determined by situational features and characteristics of the available external stimuli (Bramel, 1962(Bramel, ,1963Eldow & Kiesler, 1966;Hackett & Weisman, 1964;Miller & Swanson, 1960).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Blum (11) found that perceptual defense could be traced to the perceptual process itself. Subliminal threats were defended against, which suggests that we may be less the victims of subliminal advertising than some might believe!…”
Section: Perceptual Defensementioning
confidence: 99%