Perceptual dimensions that influence consumers' choices of milk type for beverage use

Miles, Heiko; Schwager, Steven J.; Lenz, John E.

doi:10.1002/1520-6297(199505/06)11:3<263::aid-agr2720110307>3.0.co;2-c

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These unobservable factors build hypothetical constructs representing the observable variables. Exploratory factor analysis has been widely used in the literature to reduce complexity of the data (Hansson & Lagerkvist, 2012; Miles, Schwager, & Lenz, 1995; von Meyer‐Höfer, Nitzko, & Spiller, 2015). Each observed variable is “loading” on each of the underlying factors.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Societal attitudes towards in ovo gender determination as an alternative to chick culling

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In ovo gender determination of incubated eggs can be a large‐scale substitute to the culling of male chicks in layer hen production. However, the technology raises new ethical concerns which relate to the sensitivity of the embryo, as well as how the screened out eggs will be used afterward and the accuracy of gender determination. To comprehensively investigate consumer attitudes towards this new technology, a questionnaire including a choice experiment was distributed to a representative sample of 482 German consumers between December 2018 and March 2019. The data was analyzed by an explorative factor analysis and a latent class analysis. Results indicate that the sample can be divided into four segments, which differ in preferences for production attributes, attitudes, and price sensitivity. Attitudinal differences are found regarding respondents' approval of the technical advances in agricultural production, confidence in legal regulations, and the endorsement of enhanced livestock production conditions. Both a meaningful usage of by‐products and a high rate of accuracy are crucial factors for the acceptance of in ovo gender determination for a majority of respondents. However, the response behavior of one segment, representing 11% of the sample, indicates the disapproval of both chick culling and in ovo screening.[EconLit Citations: Q160, Q510].

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%