1996
DOI: 10.3758/bf03213107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual integrality of major chord components

Abstract: In the present study, an accuracy, rather than a reaction time, version of the Garner paradigm was used to evaluate the integrality or separability of major chord components. Tuned (prototype, or P) and mistuned (nonprototype, or NP) sets of root position C-major triads were constructed by holding the C constant in all stimuli and varying the E and G frequencies in 2-and 4-Hzsteps. The P stimuli represent small systematic mistunings in the E and G notes relative to an equal-tempered C-major chord. The NP sti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This same integration, however, limited their ability to then determine the voice in which the error occurred. This conjecture fits with Sloboda's (1985, p. 170) proposal, as well as with data provided by Acker and Pastore (1996c) for chord mistunings, that listeners can often detect an error without being able to specify the voice in which it occurred, especially when the mistuning is in the middle voice.…”
Section: Comparison Of Experiments 1 Andsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This same integration, however, limited their ability to then determine the voice in which the error occurred. This conjecture fits with Sloboda's (1985, p. 170) proposal, as well as with data provided by Acker and Pastore (1996c) for chord mistunings, that listeners can often detect an error without being able to specify the voice in which it occurred, especially when the mistuning is in the middle voice.…”
Section: Comparison Of Experiments 1 Andsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Previous reports of perceptual anchors in music perception (Acker & Pastore, 1996;Acker et al, 1995, McFadden & Calloway, 1999 may also benefit from further examination. In each of these reports, the possibility of asymmetric performance was not examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the anchor hypothesis is the exact opposite of the magnet hypothesis, it provides a good explanation of response patterns observed in some music-perception experiments. For example, listeners find it easier to detect the mistuning of one tone in a major chord (a musical prototype) than an identical mistuning in a nonprototypic chord (Acker & Pastore, 1996;Acker et al, 1995;McFadden & Calloway, 1999). McFadden and Calloway propose that such response patterns are indicative of enhanced discrimination for "commonly encountered" stimuli (compared to stimuli that are encountered less frequently), which may generalize widely across the auditory domain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A trichord is a musical structure of three tones, in which the lowestand highest-frequency tones are separated by a 700-cent interval, or perfect fifth, and a third ''middle'' tone is located between the other two. Interval comparisons were generated by varying the middle tone, because a trichord's middle tone is the most salient to its identity (Acker & Pastore, 1996). Trichords were used, rather than two-tone intervals, because trichords have been explicitly observed to function as categorical prototypes, exhibiting either magnet or anchor effects depending on the manner of their presentation and a listener's level of musical experience (Barrett, 1999).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%