2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01814.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual Learning: 12‐Month‐Olds’ Discrimination of Monkey Faces

Abstract: Six-month-olds reliably discriminate different monkey and human faces whereas 9-month-olds only discriminate different human faces. It is often falsely assumed that perceptual narrowing reflects a permanent change in perceptual abilities. In 3 experiments, ninety-six 12-month-olds' discrimination of unfamiliar monkey faces was examined. Following 20 s of familiarization, and two 5-s visual-paired comparison test trials, 12-month-olds failed to show discrimination. However, following 40 s of familiarization and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

7
52
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(111 reference statements)
7
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 3 This duration is comparable to the exposure provided in other paradigms (e.g., Fair et al, 2012; Hannon & Trehub, 2005). …”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 3 This duration is comparable to the exposure provided in other paradigms (e.g., Fair et al, 2012; Hannon & Trehub, 2005). …”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…We focus specifically on the role of exposure. We know that exposure is instrumental as infants tune to the perceptual signals in their ambient environment (Doupe & Kuhl, 1999; Fair, Flom, Jones, & Martin, 2012; Friendly, Rendall, & Trainor, 2013; Kuhl et al, 1991; Werker & Tees, 1984). Might exposure also be a guiding force as infants tune the link between language and object categorization?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, Fair et al (2012) demonstrated that 12-month-olds showed no evidence of discriminating unfamiliar monkey faces after 20 s of familiarization, but did discriminate them after 40 s of familiarization. This extended familiarization period could be considered a relatively brief form of training, but it is surprising that reinstatement could be achieved after such a brief training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In interpreting the effects of different kinds of experience on reinstatement of abilities at 12 month of age, it is important to consider the results from a study by Fair et al (2012), in which sensitivity to distinctions in foreign-species (monkey) faces at 12 months was observed without a prescribed at-home training period, by simply by extending the length of the familiarization period at the time of testing. Specifically, Fair et al (2012) demonstrated that 12-month-olds showed no evidence of discriminating unfamiliar monkey faces after 20 s of familiarization, but did discriminate them after 40 s of familiarization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%