2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10670-014-9608-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual Learning and the Contents of Perception

Abstract: Suppose you have recently gained a disposition for recognizing a high-level kind property, like the property of being a wren. Wrens might look different to you now. According to the Phenomenal Contrast Argument, such cases of perceptual learning show that the contents of perception can include high-level kind properties such as the property of being a wren. I detail an alternative explanation for the different look of the wren: a shift in one's attentional pattern onto other low-level properties. Philosophers … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While shifting attention involves a change in perceptual experience, it is not obvious that it involves a change in representational content of expertise (Connolly 2014). Taken together, this literature supports the view that attention's effect on perception is widespread.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…While shifting attention involves a change in perceptual experience, it is not obvious that it involves a change in representational content of expertise (Connolly 2014). Taken together, this literature supports the view that attention's effect on perception is widespread.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…One popular hypothesis is that phenomenal difference arises due to representing a kind property that is irreducible to lower‐level properties (Siegel, ; Bayne, ) . On the other hand, it is a common claim that the R‐property responsible for change in phenomenal character is identical to one of the lower‐level properties like those connected with size, colour, spatial position, and shape (Connolly, ; Briscoe, ; Jagnow, ).…”
Section: Kind Properties and Reducibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, he focuses solely on art expertise, whereas I am focused on visual expertise in general. Arstila (2014) and Connolly (2014) are the only authors in the philosophical literature that argue that perceptual learning processes lead experts to enjoy different visual experiences than novices. Arstila (2014) also notes that experts might visually experience gestalt properties, but this is merely mentioned as a possibility and is not developed or defended in his paper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%