Perceptual manifestations of auditory modulation during speech planning

Abstract

Recent studies have provided electrophysiological evidence that the auditory system's response to externally generated auditory stimuli during speech planning is modulated in comparison to its responses to identical stimuli during no-speaking control conditions. In this study, we examined whether such neural modulations during speech planning result in measurable perceptual modulations. In a two-interval forced choice intensity discrimination paradigm, participants were asked to judge the intensity of a standard tone (with constant intensity), played during a fixation period, relative to the intensity of a comparison tone (with varying intensity), played during speech planning or during no-speaking conditions (silent reading and passive listening). Psychometric functions were fitted to participants' responses in each condition; psychometric functions were used to calculate the point of subjective equality (as a measure of perceptual threshold) and the slope of the psychometric functions (as a measure of perceptual uncertainty). We found that the point of subjective equality in the speaking condition was statistically significantly larger than that in the no-speaking conditions. In addition, slope values in the speaking and listening conditions were statistically significantly smaller than slope value in the silent reading condition. Together, these results suggest that previously reported electrophysiological modulations of the auditory system during speech planning may have perceptual manifestations, such as increases in perceptual thresholds and uncertainty of perceptual thresholds in an intensity discrimination task.

Production Variability and Categorical Perception of Vowels Are Strongly Linked

“…Similarly, auditory regions—classically believed to be involved in speech perception—are active during speech production (Tourville et al, 2008; Hickok, 2012; Niziolek et al, 2013; Skipper et al, 2017). In fact, in a series of studies, we provided behavioral and electrophysiological evidence that the auditory system is prepared for its roles in speech monitoring several 100 ms prior to speech initiation (Daliri and Max, 2015, 2016, 2018; Merrikhi et al, 2018). Overall, the dynamic relationship between auditory and motor regions plays an important role in both speech production and speech perception (Houde and Nagarajan, 2011; Guenther and Vladusich, 2012; Hickok, 2012; Houde and Chang, 2015; Daliri et al, 2018).…”

Limited Pre-Speech Auditory Modulation in Individuals Who Stutter: Data and Hypotheses

“…To date, less attention has been paid to a growing body of literature-stemming in large part from animal neurophysiology (Eliades & Wang, 2017;Seki, Perlmutter, & Fetz, 2003) but, recently, also human limb (Voss, Ingram, Haggard, & Wolpert, 2006;Williams & Chapman, 2002) and speech work (Daliri & Max, 2015b;Merrikhi, Ebrahimpour, & Daliri, 2018;Mock, Foundas, & Golob, 2015)-indicating a wholly separate, more direct influence of sensory predictions during movement planning on task-relevant sensory systems. Such a direct influence is reflected in findings demonstrating that (a) the response to externally generated inputs is also modulated during movement (Altenmüller, Berger, Prokop, Trippel, & Dietz, 1995;Chapman, Jiang, & Lamarre, 1988;Eliades & Wang, 2002;Numminen, Salmelin, & Hari, 1999;Sowman, Brinkworth, & Türker, 2010), (b) sensory modulation occurs at levels as low as the spinal cord (Chapman et al, 1988;Seki et al, 2003), and (c) sensory modulation can already start hundreds of milliseconds before movement onset or when movement is prevented altogether (Cohen & Starr, 1985;Voss et al, 2006;Walsh & Haggard, 2008Williams & Chapman, 2002).…”

Relevance of Auditory Errors Decreases When Errors Are Introduced Suddenly

“…The audio interface's output was amplified (Eurorack Pro Rx1602) and binaurally played back to the participant via insert earphones (ER-1, Etymotic Research Inc.). The amplification level of the microphone and headphones amplifiers was adjusted so that the headphones signals were played back at 5 dB higher than the microphone signal (Daliri & Max, 2015, 2016McGuffin et al, 2020;Merrikhi et al, 2018). 139…”