2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2012.03067.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptually Optimized Coded Apertures for Defocus Deblurring

Abstract: The field of computational photography, and in particular the design and implementation of coded apertures, has yielded impressive results in the last years. In this paper we introduce perceptually optimized coded apertures for defocused deblurring. We obtain near‐optimal apertures by means of optimization, with a novel evaluation function that includes two existing image quality perceptual metrics. These metrics favour results where errors in the final deblurred images will not be perceived by a human observe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Image quality metrics have been successfully applied in a variety of applications, such as automatic parameter selection [Zhu and Milanfar 2010;Mittal et al 2012a], blur-aware and noise-aware downsizing [Samadani et al 2010;Trentacoste et al 2011], and coded aperture design [Masia et al 2012]. We will discuss the difference between these methods and our approach in more detail in Sec.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Image quality metrics have been successfully applied in a variety of applications, such as automatic parameter selection [Zhu and Milanfar 2010;Mittal et al 2012a], blur-aware and noise-aware downsizing [Samadani et al 2010;Trentacoste et al 2011], and coded aperture design [Masia et al 2012]. We will discuss the difference between these methods and our approach in more detail in Sec.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Image quality metrics can be classified into two categories: full-reference and no-reference, depending on whether the ground truth image is needed. Commonly used fullreference metrics include PSNR [Teo and Heeger 1994], multiscale SSIM [Wang et al 2004], VIF [Sheikh and Bovik 2006], HDR-VDP-2 , and a linear combination of them [Masia et al 2012]. Although these metrics have been widely used for evaluating subtle image corruption, they are not able to measure the perceptual impact of the significant artifacts introduced by a variety of graphics and vision algorithms, such as image deblurring, as we will demonstrate later, and photo-realistic rendering, as demonstrated by Cadik et al [2012].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interesting option would be to combine our approach with perceptual aspects taking into account the characteristics of the human visual system (e.g. [MMG11,MPCG12]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods [6], [33], [34] can identify loss or distortions of salient regions in the original image, but again they do not take aesthetics into account. Last, used in the context of deblurring algorithms, Masia et al [35] propose an image quality measure which combines the L 2 norm, the SSIM index and the HDR-VDP-2 metric. The SSIM index performs well in measuring the structure similarity between two images, while the HDR-VDP-2 produces a good estimation on the overall quality of an image; since both of these aspects are important in image retargeting, we employ these two metrics as well when measuring structure preservation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%